The Instigator
Small_Talk
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
toady28
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Should we kill Miley Cyrus?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
toady28
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/14/2013 Category: Music
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,412 times Debate No: 38889
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

Small_Talk

Pro

She is a Disturbed, messed up person.

i say she dies.
toady28

Con

We should not kill Miley Cyrus because:
a)she has done things other artists have done and not gotten yelled at,
b)people are only taking interest in her because she was once a child star in Hannah Montana,
c)she is still transitioning from Hannah Montana,
and d)I, personaly, don't think we are murderers as a whole.
Debate Round No. 1
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Cowboy0108 3 years ago
Cowboy0108
She should die because she was a Disney star and has become a terrible influence on people. Plus, she sounds terrible and twerking.
Posted by NateTheFirst 3 years ago
NateTheFirst
Oh wait... Lol you were joking about this weren't you
Posted by NateTheFirst 3 years ago
NateTheFirst
You can't... KILL someone for doing things at are under our law. If you disagree with me and want to debate about it, then I'm fine with that. But at the moment you only put 1 round up and never really stated you point...
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
Small_Talktoady28Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: pro never even gave an argument
Vote Placed by KroneckerDelta 3 years ago
KroneckerDelta
Small_Talktoady28Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro presented no argument other than she is disturbed. Con didn't necessarily rebut that stance, but presented enough reasons not to kill her that I have to vote for Con here.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
Small_Talktoady28Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had a more detailed argument and listed reasons instead of an opinion. Not a good debate by either side though.