The Instigator
Sani
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
San_9
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

Should we punish corruptionists by death penalty?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/22/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 671 times Debate No: 37998
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

Sani

Con

No! I am against of this cruel punishment for corruption. The first and main reason is - corruption is everywhere, especially in our country. We are facing with it everyday and I am pretty sure, that some people ready to give money for their mistakes to police (as a bribe) or somebody else rather to pay a lot of money of fine to bank. Of course corruption could be differently sized, like political corruption where people steal more than millions, however death penalty is very savage way of punishment. There are a lot of different ways to scare people of not doing that! By the way, we should start the process of fight against of corruption from ourselves!
San_9

Pro

Corruption is always slow down development of the country. Every officials and representative of the government should be punish by life imprisonment or death penalty because serve to country and people is very responsible work and betray your country is one of the worst thing. People have to acknowledge that when they become officials they start fight for improve their country not to killing it. By high-ranking people depend on thousands of people and we cannot choose one person for thousands. By cruel punishment for corruption everybody will acknowledge the importance of public service and we will prevent corruption in our society.Of course we will not kill people unadvisedly, this is a very important process to prove that person is guilty and all issue should be considered in detail. If we want real results in development of the country we should legalize death penalty
Debate Round No. 1
Sani

Con

However, death penalty is the Stone Age. It existed many years ago as the vendetta for something, but death penalty was prohibited in 1990 in 40 countries. As we know from the history, death penalty was popular in Europe especially as hanging or cutting of somebody' s head. In same cases accused people were proved innocent many years ago after their killing publicly. It shows, that the government killed innocent people even they tried to find the reasons to death penalty, it means the government could be mistaken too!
If the death penalty was popular in Europe, why do they against of it right now? I think, the reason is from the trials and mistakes that they made. They understood that this system of punishment is not effective and of course it is very savage!
We live in 21 century, we need to make up new ways of punishment, where there will not be elements of violence.
Moreover, we can take the example from China (close the eyes for death penalty), they put to the prison the corruptionists with a bad conditions, where people also suffer and afraid to come back there again! Of course, they put them to the end of their life. I think, we should take this system and try to make bad conditions in prisons rather to kill people!
The second reason is - people also could be make such a mistake as a corruption and he/she could have a family, which could suffer from the lost of their lovely member of family. There is no need to kill people, we just need to teach them and it will be the beginning of end of corruption. Whichever way you look at it, people will understand that corruption is bad and will be afraid of doing that, if they know that the punishment will be serious (not death penalty!).
San_9

Pro

Do you think that putting a person to a bad condition is a less cruel than death penalty? When person acknowledge that he will live without freedom till the end of his life and will live in bad condition without seeing his family it makes more harm for him than death penalty because he lost all his life valuables. It will kill him slowly physically but spiritually fast. I do not want to say that after every crime we need to kill people but we have to do some criteria of punishment and death penalty will be used in most serious crime. Death penalty should be legalize as a powdering thing for a civil servant because some of them have not got feel of conscience
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.