Should we put down animals?
Debate Rounds (2)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Tie. Both had proper conduct in the debate. S&G - Tie. Both had errors in their spelling and grammar. However, since both made errors of equal measure, it balances out to simply a null vote in this regard. Arguments - Pro. Con simply stated that they shouldn't be put down. Pro responded by saying he loves fried chicken, implying that animals being put down is what is necessary for fried chicken. Con then agreed, instead of challenging Pro, which then left Pro standing unchallenged. Pro finished this off by arguing how they are necessary for meat/food. Since Pro finished off unchallenged due to Con's agreement in the final round, Pro rightfully wins arguments. Sources - Tie. Neither utilized sources in this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.