The Instigator
CocoJones
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
MyDonutIsShapedLikeAButt
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points

Should we put down animals?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
MyDonutIsShapedLikeAButt
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/1/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 486 times Debate No: 70852
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

CocoJones

Con

Animals should not be put down, it is too GAURI
MyDonutIsShapedLikeAButt

Pro

I love fried chicken! :)
Debate Round No. 1
CocoJones

Con

Me too dude
MyDonutIsShapedLikeAButt

Pro

Animals need population and it can be used for food. Meat is the best! Meat is yummy. And yah man, I'm looking at u baby.
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
CocoJonesMyDonutIsShapedLikeAButtTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Tie. Both had proper conduct in the debate. S&G - Tie. Both had errors in their spelling and grammar. However, since both made errors of equal measure, it balances out to simply a null vote in this regard. Arguments - Pro. Con simply stated that they shouldn't be put down. Pro responded by saying he loves fried chicken, implying that animals being put down is what is necessary for fried chicken. Con then agreed, instead of challenging Pro, which then left Pro standing unchallenged. Pro finished this off by arguing how they are necessary for meat/food. Since Pro finished off unchallenged due to Con's agreement in the final round, Pro rightfully wins arguments. Sources - Tie. Neither utilized sources in this debate.