Should we stop using hydroelectric plants?
Debate Rounds (3)
While it can be argued,that we should stop using hydroelectric plants,i do believe they are a cleaner resource than most alternative mediums of creating power for a large area of people,particualry a locale,where their is a large concentration of people. When it comes to the cleanest alternatives for power,we have serveral choices for creating power,Solar Power,Nuclear Power,and Hydroelectric plants,while hydroelectric power creation,is the oldest innovation,out of the three for creating power,and ultimately the most harmful to the enviorment,over a long period of time,it's cleaner than using Coal Power,or gas power.
Furthermore other than destroying the nature, hydroelectric plant is very expensive and may take a decade to be profitable.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by donald.keller 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct and Sources are mute topics. Pro definitely won spelling. As for arguments... I found both sides hard to agree with. Pro wasn't firm, and conceded to the idea, only claiming it wasn't practical, more than it being wrong. Overall, Con couldn't uphold the resolution.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.