The Instigator
Sunnyle
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Warik
Pro (for)
Winning
6 Points

Should we use well-known or local celebrity endorsement for a multinational company

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Warik
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/24/2014 Category: Education
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 805 times Debate No: 59496
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Sunnyle

Con

A well-known celebrity has more impact on consumer rather than a local famous person.
Warik

Pro

A well known celebrity runs the risk of being a high risk high reward situation. The price of a well known celebrity could reach several hundred thousand dollars for a appearance that may or not work. If a well known celebrity is used and it does not create enough revenue to pay the celebrity and get a decent profit then the well known celebrity endorsement becomes a failure.

Another problem of the well known celebrity is their popularity might hide the very message that the advertisers wanted to send. Celebrities popularity can and often overshadow the product and cause one to never remember the product. Hence it hurts the ROI (return on investment).

http://frog-dog.com...

Meanwhile it would be far cheaper to get a celebrity that is locally known as they would be far cheaper and the ROI would be far higher while the risk would be far lower.

http://www.forbes.com...
Debate Round No. 1
Sunnyle

Con

Sunnyle forfeited this round.
Warik

Pro

Because sunnyle has forfeited the round, i will forfeit this round as well and extend my argument
Debate Round No. 2
Sunnyle

Con

Sunnyle forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
SunnyleWarikTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: FF