Should women have rights
Debate Rounds (3)
To settle the objective of the debate as Pro has failed to use to her advantage I will do so myself.
In this debate, Pro will have to use her present knowledge and acquired knowledge throughout the course of the debate to keep her points active that women as a whole should have rights. I, as Con, will need to rebuttal those points and bring her reasons for arguing that women should have rights down. At least half of her points must stand for the debate to be hers to win.
The winner of these rules will get the vote for: Agreed with before the debate; Agreed with after the debate.
The other points apply as they usually would.
"The people. Saying that women dont have rights are mostly men!" -the majority of the feminist movement is female. This is just common sense.
"I am a twelve year old GIRL that want to become an author, not a slave that makes food for men all day long!" -If you are on the earth you cannot legally become a slave, so this is invalid.
"I see so many people saying women are dumb, women arent human, women cant do anything but cook for men. Well, you are wrong. There are women in NASA that work really hard, they get thi gs done!" -In this statement, woman is a term used to cover many people, unless you find some research article that says that the majority of women have a higher IQ than their male counterpart, this doesn't apply.
"people dont care about their oppinion at all!" - I am a person, by definition, and there are many women whose opinions I care about. So this is invalid.
Many of these points don't even contribute to the fact that women as a whole deserve rights. I expect a more polished argument in the future. I look forward to your response.
Slavery in the world 1) http://borgenproject.org...
Lizzy_Redfox forfeited this round.
To the voters: Since my opponent's points do not stand, and she had the BoP, I therefore win the debate. Vote Con!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Reigon 7 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: "My oponant is very good, i quit enjoy this debate!" Pro FF, misspelled opponent and did not capitalize I.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.