The Instigator
Massmurderer
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
BatNips
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

Should xbows be buffed up to before?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
BatNips
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/22/2016 Category: Games
Updated: 10 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 193 times Debate No: 90090
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Massmurderer

Pro

X-bows should be buffed. First off, it is extremely hard to protect your X-bow if it has the range it currently has. The range is right at the red line where you can't place any troops. If you place an X-bow offensively, it can easily be destroyed by almost any troop. Currently I think the X-bow only has 12 range compared to the 13 it used to be. It used to be able to have a tesla or space for troop to protect the X-bow. X-bows are practically useful as defensive buildings because of their small damage and amount of elixir cost.
BatNips

Con

No. Xbows should not be returned to their original state, it would casue outrage among players. Why do you think Sueprcell nerfed them in the first place? Second of all, I still encounter people that use the Xbow and win a lot, this just means that Xbows will be even stronger if they're buffed up.
Debate Round No. 1
Debate Round No. 2
Massmurderer

Pro

Hdhfhfksnfj
BatNips

Con

And that will wrap it up!
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by famousdebater 10 months ago
famousdebater
MassmurdererBatNipsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had the sole BOP as they were requesting for a change in the Clash Royale status quo. Pro made arguments. Con refutes. Pro doesn't counter refute anything that Con says meaning that his BOP cannot be fulfilled. Ergo, I vote con on the premise that Pro had no arguments standing by the end of the debate.