The Instigator
eyeballsac
Pro (for)
Losing
8 Points
The Contender
Romanii
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

Since Humanity is depleting natural resources, all humans should be euthanized

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Romanii
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/8/2013 Category: Funny
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 510 times Debate No: 41920
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (5)

 

eyeballsac

Pro

First round for acceptance.
Romanii

Con

I accept this debate :p
Debate Round No. 1
eyeballsac

Pro

My argument is that if everybody died, then that would stop polution. Cars wont emute fumes if noody is driving them.
Romanii

Con

Hmmmm.. yes. Very insightful.
Let me just pose a small question:
Are you okay with dying for the sake of the environment?
Debate Round No. 2
eyeballsac

Pro

If dying means I will be able to live in a pollution free world, then I would be happy to oblige.
Romanii

Con

A very noble cause to die for. However, I see one tiny flaw in your logic:
if you die, you won't be around to live in the pollution free world.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Romanii 3 years ago
Romanii
Honestly, don't take this debate too seriously.
Eyeballsac is definitely trolling.
Posted by ZebramZee 3 years ago
ZebramZee
Isn't humanity a part of nature? How can you separate them out? Would we say lions are consuming natural resources?
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
eyeballsacRomaniiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: nice philosophical debate
Vote Placed by dkishore 3 years ago
dkishore
eyeballsacRomaniiTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was disabling heaven.
Vote Placed by Matt_L 3 years ago
Matt_L
eyeballsacRomaniiTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was logical while Pro was not.
Vote Placed by Josh_b 3 years ago
Josh_b
eyeballsacRomaniiTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: This is obviously a catch 22
Vote Placed by AndrewB686 3 years ago
AndrewB686
eyeballsacRomaniiTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Ah what an insightful and productive debate. The sarcasm might be stale considering I usually don't vote on troll debates, but there's a first for everything. Cons wins, plain and simple. Pro can't enjoy the utopian reality of an environment void of pollution if he himself is dead. That fatal flaw undid his resolution, therefore it shall be dismissed.