Slenderman vs. Jeff
Debate Rounds (4)
Jeff Dunham, as opposed to slenderman, is a ventriloquist and a stand-up comedian who has appeared on TV shows such as: The Tonight Show, Sonny With a Chance, and The Late Show. So obviously, slenderman's idiotic hypno-stare will only work on his talking dummy. Then, Jeff, being the smart human he is, can simply pull out his .44 magnum, and blow off slenderman's faceless head. Ventriloquists also have the supernatural power to throw their voice, making it sound like they are somewhere else in the room. So once faceless slendy tries to follow the sound, Jeff can pull out his magnum and again, blow Mr. S into oblivion. Slender is an amateur compared to Jeff Dunham. And Jeff is a comedian too, so he's cooler than the slender looking man.
Slenderman is a tall, slender figure with 8 tentacles extruding his back, and no face. He is considered the most famous of the creepy pastas; horror short stories http://creepypasta.wikia.com....... Slenderman is seen as a figure that lures people into a hypnotic state with his stare (even though he doesn't have a face, weird :P),in this state, the people walk in a trance like state, right into Slendeman's grasp. Once there, nobody really knows what happens to the people once Slenderman gets to them, but many people believes he impales them in one of his eight tentacle, killing them. But nobody really knows. if Jeff the Killer, another creepypasta, tries to fight good ol' slendy, he will become hypnotized, and travel right into sledy's grasp. End of discussion
wolf24 forfeited this round.
yomama12 forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Pro. Con clearly trolled, which was something that would normally be fine but in this case it was con ignoring Pro's request in the comment section. That is quite rude. S&G - Tie. Both had adequate spelling and grammar. Arguments - Con. Pro conceded the debate, thus arguments goes to Con. Sources - Pro. Pro was the only one to utilize sources in this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.