Debate Rounds (3)
A little background about me, I am a Canadian citizen who believes in social democracy, i have done research into politics and ideologies and am interested in the beliefs of others.
Now Please let this be a proper debate no offensive language or assaults.
Is a lie! He toast Jews like they pita bread and try to take over world like Genghis Khan on acid!
Social Democracy tell you to think that always majority being happy is good thing but sometimes making majority suffer is good thing because in words of great Rihanna (look at song for evidence that the speak this words) CHAIN AND WHIP EXCITE ME!
There is two types of Social Democratic personality! The one who count the ballot with honesty because they won the vote or the one who fake winning the vote anyway! This the way Social Democracy train you to be, Stalin do it, Hitler do it and all other pinnacle of democracy do it throughout historically! Think that 'we vote and give majority what they want and good will happen' is like to think that 'give three men a boner better than just my husband' oh no you get divorce because of this!
Wow okay, Social democracy worst thing since the flu!
They only thing they mention is that certain European nations are democratic but not dictatorships. Dictatorships are not democracies in the first place. Aside from this, a major flaw of European nation is that they are far too nice to nasty people. When France outlawed hijab its own people began rioting and screaming in outrage, but when Saudi Arabia outlawed western clothing and lack of Hijab, no one batted an eyelid. Europe is often condemned by the less democratic Muslims for being rude to Muslims but they are actually so ridiculously overly polite and scared of engaging in full blow nuking on these Jihadis that they, as a whole, as considered the cowards of this world.
Again before you applied that Hitler and Stalin were social democrats or it would seem, which they weren't.
Another thing is is that im not sure what your point is about taking military action in the middle east. if in case your saying that you want to engage in a complete nuclear strike on the middle east then i think you really don't understand what would happen. All conservatives and libertarians alike don't want to go to war never mind nuclear war.
If you really think that detonating nuclear weapons over the middle east is a good idea, then you really don't know enough of whats going to understand this debate
So far we shifted from me trying to redefine what a dictatorship is to trying and trying to explain why its not a good idea to start a nuclear holocaust on the Muslim population.
And let me remind you of who else has nuclear weapons. Russia and China both of which have ICBM's and thermonuclear weapons and will not stand for a nuclear genocide on the Muslims.
wowwhatwhy forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Theunkown 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||7||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Forfieture
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.