The Instigator
moses_moses
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
moneystacker
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

Social networking sites are good for our society!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
moneystacker
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/22/2014 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 504 times Debate No: 63756
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)

 

moses_moses

Pro

Social networking sites are good for our society!
moneystacker

Con

I accept debate and await pros argument
Debate Round No. 1
moses_moses

Pro

moses_moses forfeited this round.
moneystacker

Con

I will just post something to get a win since he forfeited so yeah due to forfeit I at least win 100% on conduct

My argument will be simple I am not gonna waste 115-30 minutes researching and preparing a difficult speech if I have no opponent this will be just a regular speech because that is all I need to win.

cont 1: threats from social networking sites
A survey on mic.com shows that at least 50% of rapes happen from info posted on social media about where they live. Yes it can be avoided if they hide this info but many teenagers are not considering this, or kind of like your house catching on fire, don't believe it will happen to them.

cont 2: Some teenagers make social media their life
On fox news they interview some people who stay on as long as 16 hours a day because they feel like social media is their life. Their are even some who get the 2 worlds mixed up and have to go get therapy.

Ok that's all I am posting if opponent returns I will add more stuff but its not worth wasting time if no opponent just a argument at all is what I need to win so that's all ima do a simple argument.
Debate Round No. 2
moses_moses

Pro

moses_moses forfeited this round.
moneystacker

Con

yeah vote me
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by moneystacker 2 years ago
moneystacker
that's why I am going neg its a very controversy topic so will be a lot of clash. I would have raher debated on his other topic should people give money to neighbors which is easy to beat but didn't know that was out :c so have to debate this one. But good news is a lot of clash arguments both sides.
Posted by cheyennebodie 2 years ago
cheyennebodie
Like anything else, it can be used for good or bad.Like money. It takes on the personality of why it is used. If used to buy food for the family is good. If used to buy heroine, it is bad.It takes wisdom to keep it on the right track.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Imperfiect 2 years ago
Imperfiect
moses_mosesmoneystackerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: lack of punctuation and capitalization for Con means Pro gets S&G. FF otherwise