The Instigator
padfo0t
Pro (for)
Winning
70 Points
The Contender
Solarman1969
Con (against)
Losing
20 Points

Solarman1969 is rood mainly for the attention.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/4/2008 Category: Society
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 3,306 times Debate No: 4904
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (40)
Votes (18)

 

padfo0t

Pro

Hi ,
During a debate concerning the sport of swimming, Solarman1969 and I got into a verbal arguement that may still now be going on. Nevertheless, he will probably make a comment on this debate (if accepted) on how I am a 'scared mouse', or another common 'little boy-girl'. Either this, or a cheek remark of the opposite that oozes sarcasm. Solarman1969- yes you!- feels the need to maintain his reputation as a rood jerk who can never win a debate. He is probably not that bad a person in real life, but has nothing better to do.
Solarman1969

Con

first of all , child

you cant even spell

ROOD? uhmm I think you mean RUDE

maybe your time would be better spent on learning your ABCs rather that try and start arguments with adults who will simply make you look like the fook you are.

nuff sed

SOALARMAN
Debate Round No. 1
padfo0t

Pro

Instead of wasting my time defending my misspelled word,
It is much easier to point out all the errors in my opponent's 'argument'.
My point exactly.

And by also assuming 'rood' was meant as 'rude', the previous 'argument' also PROVES MY POINT EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!

Instead of focusing on trying to be NICE and SMART for ONCE, Solarman1969 continues to be arrogant and ROOD -I don't car if I have to make up another definition!!!!!!!!!!.

To prove that his inappropriate behavior is focusing on grabbing him/herself more attention, my guess is that many people will vote (which I encourage).

As I look back at Solarman1969's first 'argument' I can count 12 grammatical or punctual mistakes.

Now unless any evidence is presented in the defense of Solarman1969's point, I don't see why I have already won this debate.

"nuff sed"
hee hee
Solarman1969

Con

Barack Hussein Obambi is evil and must be stopped

the democratic party is evil and corrupt and must be stopped
Debate Round No. 2
padfo0t

Pro

Hello everyone,

Once again I must complete an argument or forfeit. You can guess what I chose--
Because Solarman1969 has not refuted my points or come up with any of his own that would benefit this debate, I must again come up with evidence so that I may win.

First. Solarman1969 has taunted me and my spelling mistake, saying that I must "learn my ABCs", and called me a "fook". This shows that Solarman is extremely rude -thankyou- and doesn't really care if he wins the debate or not. You might think that after 62 losses, and only 1 win, he realizes that he most often loses, and his primary goal is to piss people off.
Seeing that he is tremendously successfull at his goal, we can assume that he is rude for the attention it brings him. Most common debators know who he is, not to mention his reputation, and this attantion clearly ammuses him.
I have made a list of moments that this is evident:

*******************************************************************************
*******************************************************************************
"Ill call idiots idiots and fools fools all day long if it offends you delicate sensibilities thats your problem"
-Solarman1969, SILVER IS THE ANSWER

"Again the morons chime in. Kids with NO KNOWLEDGE OF ANYTHING trying to argue with a MS in Chem E and Mech E with 20+ years in Biochem, Pharamcology, and Epidimiology"
"You have provided no relevant scientific evidence whatsoever
Put up, or shut the f*ck up"
"Oh Poor baby!"
"Why dont you go home to mommy and cry?"
-Solarman1969, SILVER IS THE ANSWER

"Ineed not address the silly points that this moron found in 10 seconds on the internet."
-Solarman1969, SILVER IS THE ANSWER

"all of the crap you put forth is BS"
-Solarman1969, SILVER IS THE ANSWER

"YOU NEED TO HAVE YOUR HEAD EXAMINED"
-Solarman1969, MORALITY IS SUBJECTIVE

"most kids are totally stupid and have no idea just how stupid they are"
-Solarman1969, MORALITY IS SUBJECTIVE

"you are an idiot and are not worth debating science with...FOOL!"
-Solarman1969, HYDROGEN IS THE ANSWER

"Again, YOU ARE A MORON"
-Solarman1969, HYDROGEN IS THE ANSWER

"hey convict loser, crawl back in the hole you came from
you are not worthy of this debate as your IQ is only -5"
-Solarman1969, HYDROGEN IS THE ANSWER

"Debate.org is just filled with idiot savant kids who think they have a CLUE what their talking about"
-Solarman1969, HYDROGEN IS THE ANSWER

"BECAUSE YOURE A WEENIE LIBERAL JUST LIKE ALL THE OTHER LOSER WEENIES THAT I CONSISTENTLY SPANK WITH FACTS"
-Solarman1969, PROSTITUTION - SHOULD IT BE LEGAL?

"I could give a flying F*** what you and the totality of the little marxist morons on this site think"
-Solarman1969, PROSTITUTION - SHOULD IT BE LEGAL?

"you all need to learn the english language"
-Solarman1969, PROSTITUTION - SHOULD IT BE LEGAL?

"hey typewriter monkey. why dont you devote some more time to high school so you can learn to write the english language coherently and spell?"
-Solarman1969, PROSTITUTION - SHOULD IT BE LEGAL?

"you have NO CLUE and NO LIFE EXPERIENCE"
-Solarman1969, PROSTITUTION - SHOULD IT BE LEGAL?

"youre a total idiot"
-Solarman1969, DO NOT VACCINATE YOUR INFANT...

"you are totally full of it and are also completely wrong"
-Solarman1969, DO NOT VACCINATE YOUR INFANT...

"I see you are only 18, and are thus completely clueless"
-Solarman1969, SOCIALIZATION OF THE WOMB...

"you are truly a wuss and a disturbed human being"
-Solarman1969, SOCIALIZATION OF THE WOMB...

"You need to go back to english class or something and learn how to spell and speak proper."
-Solarman1969, YESTERDAY WAS A KEY TURNING POINT...

"you are a complete and utter MORON"
-Solarman1969, MALE HOMOSEXUALITY IS A MENTAL ILLNESS

"you need to learn to READ"
-Solarman1969, MALE HOMOSEXUALITY IS A MENTAL ILLNESS

"hey LUFNUT
youre a complete moron"
-Solarman1969, MALE HOMOSEXUALITY IS A MENTAL ILLNESS

"gays are simply CHICKENS who cant deal with WOMEN"
-Solarman1969, MALE HOMOSEXUALITY IS A MENTAL ILLNESS

"you retard"
-Solarman1969, MSRA AND OTHER SUPERBUGS...

"you are so young , you dont even have a clue what your talking about"
-Solarman1969, I FIGURED OUT WHY BARACK OBAMA IS SO COOL...

"you are the same PETTY MONEY CONCERNED FOOL that thinks..."
-Solarman1969, I FIGURED OUT WHY BARACK OBAMA IS SO COOL...

"I couldnt care less what the little commie kids think and if their little feelings offended"
-Solarman1969, HERE COME THE GIANTS...

**************************************************************************************************************************************************************

"I am rude, always have been." -Solarman
This is proof of this rudeness, and if Solarman really wanted to debate not for attention, but for the actual pride in winning an argument, he would LEAVE.
Solarman1969

Con

I got over trying to get attention years ago

Now I am rude to try and WAKE UP YOU LIBERAL FOOLS SO WE DONT LOSE THIS GREAT NATION AND OUR FREEDOM TO THE ISLAMISTS AND SOCIALISTS

nuff sed
Debate Round No. 3
40 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by padfo0t 8 years ago
padfo0t
Yet again Solarman attempts to spoil the art of debate with nonsense gibberish.
Posted by Solarman1969 8 years ago
Solarman1969
Liberalism is a Dangerous mental disorder

this is clearly on display daily in DC - watch the fools go

and watch the kids here defend their nonsense
Posted by padfo0t 8 years ago
padfo0t
Yeah! What orange said!
I think this debate is a classic example of the useless arguments and insults that continue to spawn for the evil mouth of my competitor.
Posted by sagarous 8 years ago
sagarous
And most liberals are not "fools." I can name many conservative ones too (esp. those who call others 'liberal fools'>ahem<.
Posted by sagarous 8 years ago
sagarous
I completely agree with crazypenguin on his most recent comment.
To solarman's most recent comment: not only is that comment offensive and rude, it is a disgrace to this activity called debate. Debate is not an activity where one participant insults another. In addition, solarman, YOU grow up. Your rebuttals usually consist of unsupported "facts" and often shaky warrants, while most of your rebuttals consist of insults and other words that should never be used in a debate.
Posted by sagarous 8 years ago
sagarous
Shame on you solarman
Posted by padfo0t 8 years ago
padfo0t
Quite justinly, i'm going to say one thing. This is not a flawed debate. There is no way to debate on Solarman's intentions UNLESS he agrees with me. (which he did). The reason you voted for Solarman is because you didn't read the debate and thus have not realized that I have won. Also, Solarman1969 hardly debates and used the page to complain. He never refuted my points thus what I say goes and that means you should vote for me.
Posted by Im_always_right 8 years ago
Im_always_right
wow, I missed alot....
Posted by burningpuppies101 8 years ago
burningpuppies101
Quite frankly, i'm going to say one thing. This is a flawed debate. There is no way to debate on Solarman's intentions, because only one person knows his intentions; him. Therefore, this is a flawed debate, and seeing as it is the propositions job to prove something, and he failed, the con has won this debate. The con has no burden of proof. He doesn't have to prove anything. That is the pros side, and he failed miserably because he decided to set himself up in a debate where only Solarman can win. Therefore, i voted for solarman, only for the fact that he didn't have to prove anything, and pro did a horrible job proving anything, which is his job.
Posted by crazypenguin 8 years ago
crazypenguin
I think padfo0t is right and solarman is just insulting us to cover up his debating skills.
18 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 1 year ago
9spaceking
padfo0tSolarman1969Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by RawChicken 4 years ago
RawChicken
padfo0tSolarman1969Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Pandora9321 6 years ago
Pandora9321
padfo0tSolarman1969Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by ournamestoolong 8 years ago
ournamestoolong
padfo0tSolarman1969Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by sagarous 8 years ago
sagarous
padfo0tSolarman1969Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by padfo0t 8 years ago
padfo0t
padfo0tSolarman1969Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by birdpiercefan3334 8 years ago
birdpiercefan3334
padfo0tSolarman1969Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:61 
Vote Placed by burningpuppies101 8 years ago
burningpuppies101
padfo0tSolarman1969Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Ineffablesquirrel 8 years ago
Ineffablesquirrel
padfo0tSolarman1969Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by wheelhouse3 8 years ago
wheelhouse3
padfo0tSolarman1969Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03