Some materials from books and games should be used in real life.
Debate Rounds (5)
I have seen many books in my lifetime and there are quite some interesting materials inside some of them. A lot of things that could actually be helpful aren't been made. One of the things that I have seen and is possibly my favorite of them all is something that would make you 'invisible'. It consists of many screens and cameras. There are tiny screen with even tinier cameras on them. These cameras are linked to the cameras directly opposite of them. What the cameras see are displayed on the screen so that from which ever angle you are looking all you see is what is directly behind this invisibility suit. It would be quite useful for agents who work in stealth.
While perhaps these concepts from fiction shoudl be used, it makes much more sense to simply create the ideas from real life itself. Using his example, why use this description from fiction, when it would be much more efficient to research what would actually work in the real world and create based on that.
It might make more sense to create the ideas from real life itself but when you really think about it all of those ideas in books and games are created from real life itself. All of these ideas are created by humans to provide understanding to their knowledge. Since all of these ideas come from a person's imagination and a person's imagination is quite real, I believe that some of these ideas, in a way, are real too. If you decide to go even further you would realize that these are actually real ideas that are given to the world in other forms. There are those scientists that get their ideas and then start working on them but there are also the people that get their ideas and just give them to the world. There are of course some ideas that are given to the world which seem completely impossible. Some of these ideas could manifest themselves in real life later on. An example of something that seemed completely impossible until some time ago would be flying. A long time ago people thought flying would be completely impossible but now there are even more than 350,000 airplanes worldwide.
With these looked over the only category left is the category of those that are completely impossible. These ideas can still be used in real life as an inspiration for something different.
Thank you for reading and good luck.
* The Wright brothers were the first to make a full piloted, heavier than air, self propelled craft.
If all ideas in books come from real life, then it makes no sense to have to argue that they should be used in real life. If they already come from real life, then they must already be used in real life. My opponent has said that ideas are already real, thus everything in a book is already real, no need to use it in real life, it is already in use in real life. There is no argument.
The other thing is that by real life I meant day to day life. The everyday life that people live in. The ideas are real but they are nothing more than ideas until someone or something decide to make them more than that.
I'll now go back to the idea about the Wright brothers making the first full piloted,heavier than air, self propelled craft.
The idea was real when the Wright brothers got it. But even though the idea was real was it being manifested in real life?
I really don't think so.
I believe my argument still stands.
But still, thank you Magicr for that wonderful argument.
My opponent seems to have a lot of interesting examples of how ideas can be used in "everyday life" however I have yet to hear any reason why ideas from books should be used in real life.
Since you want a reason of why some materials from books should be used in everyday life I will give you one.
1. There are smart people that write they're ideas in books instead of telling people.
Just because someone is smart does not mean that their ideas should be used in everday life. There are many smart people who do not always produce useful ideas.
I believe my opponent has failed to prove that ideas from books should be used in life as he has only given one such reason and I have just refuted it.
I thank him for this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by whyt3nn3rdy 4 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||4|
Reasons for voting decision: S/G was obvious. Args to Con I guess for refuting Pro's initial point to an extent. Sources to Pro for having them. Conduct to Pro because he did prove why they should be used, Con didn't refute Pro's points to the point of the actual debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.