Some video games are bad for kids
Debate Rounds (3)
Although Video Games can be beneficial if appropriate .Video games helped me build a strong imaginary. It opens your mind to possibilty most positive but also negative. For instance Super Mario, amazing story line gives kids a super hero and a creative mind set were not all bad guys are not bad. Which is great and positive thing but not all kids play Super Mario or super hero games.
Now as we go with increase technology more play video games it"s easy to get to. With increase technology and low amount of parents of watching what activity kids play in their games more filth can be in taken. Many kids can download "inappropriate" games without parents being verified.Due to all of this kids are playing wrongful games brought up by friends who let borrow games, downloaded games etc.
Yes Kids are rotten kids minds as we go one. I"ve had experienced this effect even now playing video games as a 16 year old. I played a game where you put a chip in somebody"s phone and when you call them it blew their brains out. After I"ve seen that I freaked out for a lil bit knowing that can really happen in life. That was my reaction to it imagine a child"s response to that like your lil kid, or nephew they would be scared, terrified etc.
In conclusion kids shouldn"t be playing so much video games. It helps but very little it mostly destroys the mind. By personal experience more kids have to be more active before the 40 or 60 not being able to run due to joint damage. All in all make our kids active today for a better much more active tomorrow
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Spelling goes to Con for not capitalizing I and the improper grammar in round 1. Con wins arguments based on the fact that Pro really didn't refute many of his points that Con batted down. The two sides should have used sources to enhance their arguments.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.