The Instigator
Willdeas
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
segregory
Pro (for)
Winning
2 Points

Space vacuums

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
segregory
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/17/2016 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 9 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 191 times Debate No: 91385
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

Willdeas

Con

Are space vacuums real. I say no because if there is nothing in the vacuums it is nonexistent please leave your opinion and vote
segregory

Pro

Vacuum is space void of matter. And that is true. So they are real.
Debate Round No. 1
Willdeas

Con

vacuums are nonexistent and are said not to have any parasitical in them and if nothing is in them, that space should not exist
segregory

Pro

But it does. The mass combines in this matter. Which proves that it is possible for a space vacuum to be in existence.
Debate Round No. 2
Willdeas

Con

In space vacuums there are virtual particles which means that means that vacuums do not exist because there are particles in them. Also when light particles pass through a vacuum that he vacuum is not a vacuum because there are particles in them.
segregory

Pro

This is a satellite pic of one. https://www.google.com...
Debate Round No. 3
Willdeas

Con

But there are still "virtual particles."
segregory

Pro

And that mabye right that the space vacuus you look at through a telescope might not actually be what you think. It could be a dark black hole or other figures or just no stars in that area.
Debate Round No. 4
Willdeas

Con

Thank you lets just leave it at a theory vacuums may not exist
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by zookdook1 9 months ago
zookdook1
Define 'vacuum'. And 'real'. In context though.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ockham 9 months ago
Ockham
WilldeassegregoryTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: Both sides ended up agreeing on a compromise position, so no points for arguments on either side. Pro was the only one who posted any sources, so he gets the points for that.