The Instigator
rockcityboy
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
9spaceking
Con (against)
Winning
13 Points

Spongebob is the best show for children comedy(kids cartoons not adult ones)

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
9spaceking
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/22/2014 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,066 times Debate No: 62112
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (3)

 

rockcityboy

Pro

Its the best show because it has a high level of comedy. Sponge bob character designs are funny and also the plots are always new
-way more decent comedy than any other shows
-spongebob cracks u up everytime
-its pretty good and is very succesful
9spaceking

Con

I choose MLP:FiM, now argue why spongebob is better
Debate Round No. 1
rockcityboy

Pro

PRos for sponge bob
- too funny
- great animation and art
-Its on nick
-tooo funny'
- the character has no life
- best show on nick
Cons
- idk
Rebuttal
- dont know this person
-my little pony sucks
- not better
9spaceking

Con

REBUTTALS
"Spongebob is too funny"
Yeah right. Spongebob has been running for such an insanely long time, the producers are running out of ideas, and the show is getting less and less funny.

"Best show on nick"
It does not matter. It cannot defeat MLP.
On CSM it is rated 3 stars. [1] MLP is 4 stars. [2] See the vast difference.

"Great animation and art"
This is subjective. However, there remains much more fans of MLP. You see, MLP is so darn popular there is a name for the fans, "Bronies". There's even a documentary for that one word, seen in source [3]. There is no name for fans of Spongebob, and of course there is no documentary because none can be made. End of story.

"The character has no life"
This is contradictory. If you watch a show about a character with no life, it is not good because the character has no life.

Yeah, see? Things are only interesting if characters have life!
(See video for super lively character)


Your arguments are rebutted. Try again!

[1] https://www.commonsensemedia.org...
[2] https://www.commonsensemedia.org...
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 2
rockcityboy

Pro

wikipedias not a source so some of your info could be fake also spongebob has won many awards and expands.
The character is too funny and some people dont think this have no sense of humor.
Spongebob fans get a name
Spongefanboys
Also it is since it has more likes than most shows on CN AND NICK and it is succesful

MLP is for babies and just has ponies. Ponies dont exist lol so it sucks
9spaceking

Con

Wikipedia is not a source? My information could be fake? Then, why is there the official movie website there? [1] Also, at least I use sources. You haven't shown what awards spongebob has won.
SpongeBob is too funny--you have not justified why SpongeBob is so funny.
Spongefanboys--yeah right, you just invented that on the spot. And this name does not have a documentary on it, therefore it is not as well known or as good as the name of bronies.

"MLP is for babies"
Then why do I see loads of bronies everywhere?
Spongebob is "successful", my opponent claims. My opponent also claims everyone loves it. Yet source [2] show people clearly complaining about the show getting old and the jokes getting rusty and not working.
In conclusion my opponent has tried and tried in vain. But he has failed to show Spongebob better than MLP.
VOTE PONIES.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by rockcityboy 2 years ago
rockcityboy
s
Posted by rockcityboy 2 years ago
rockcityboy
Wss
Posted by rockcityboy 2 years ago
rockcityboy
vote
Posted by Dilara 2 years ago
Dilara
Patrick!
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by a_mysterious_stranger 2 years ago
a_mysterious_stranger
rockcityboy9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had no sources, and had a weak argument without the sources.
Vote Placed by Jellon 2 years ago
Jellon
rockcityboy9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Source points for con, because con used many sources and pro didn't use any. Pro's argument was mostly, if not entirely, subjective. Con was able to substantiate claims using data.
Vote Placed by dynamicduodebaters 2 years ago
dynamicduodebaters
rockcityboy9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: 9spaceking, you bronie, you provided evidence refuting and upholding your side.