Arts (558)
Economics (401)
Education (1,599)
Entertainment (2,183)
Health (1,159)
Miscellaneous (2,904)
News (324)
Philosophy (1,422)
Politics (5,893)
Religion (3,219)
Science (1,223)
Society (3,350)
Sports (871)
Technology (677)

The Instigator

Pro (for)

SuperDanyluk

Losing

0 Points

The Contender

Con (against)

WeirdJohn12

Winning

14 Points

Star gate better then star wars

Add to My FavoritesReport this DebateShare with My Friends

Do you like this debate?No Yes+1

Vote Here

		Pro	Tied	Con
	Who did you agree with before the debate?
	Who did you agree with after the debate?
	Who had better conduct?
	Who had better spelling and grammar?
	Who made more convincing arguments?
	Who used the most reliable sources?

Reasons for your voting decision - Required

1,000 Characters Remaining

The voting period for this debate does not end.

Started:	3/20/2011	Category:	Arts
Updated:	2 years ago	Status:	Voting Period
Viewed:	1,074 times	Debate No:	15490

Debate Rounds (3)

Comments (1)

Votes (5)

Pro Star gate is better then star wars for verious reasons first of all the weapons could disenegrate a lightsaber. Report this Argument Con First of all nothing can destroy a light saber. The blaster rifle can blast through anything and it just bounces off. So your first argument is invalid. Report this Argument
Pro Nope because the v sniper gun created by the Gawool has meany purposes for instance one shot will parilize the saber two shots it dies and three shots disinagrates anything.Say Darth Vader attempts to take over earth S.G. 1 would take him and his army out i a heartbeat 3 shots a Vader is just dust.And Vaders stormtroopers are not siths so shoot them down with r.p.gs and rocket launchers no more Vader. Report this Argument Con First a light saber can not die and the light saber can not be paralyzed. My second argument is that the emperor has a large army full of a variety of soldiers. The emperor also has a spaceship that blows up planets. The emperor also has the force and Vader. So I believe the star gate army will lose to the empire. Report this Argument
Pro yes but the empor wouldnt destroy earth he would find evil people on earth for a sith that and the aincents have a speacial forcefeild that ca deflect anything destroing the death star. Report this Argument Con First you said the Emperor wouldn't destroy earth and find evil people for sith. If this statement is true then why did the emperor only have one apprentice. The emperor only cares about taking over the universe. Then you said the ancients have a force field that can deflect anything well so did the planet that the Death Star destroyed and the empire just attacked over and over until the planet is all out of defenses. Report this Argument

Post a Comment

1 comment has been posted on this debate.

Posted by Addison_Barton 2 years ago

Call me bias, but i dont even need to view this debate to say: Star Wars kills stargate. Nothing can beat star wars, star wars allways wins. Enough said.

Report this Comment

5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.

Vote Placed by bcresmer 1 year ago

	SuperDanyluk	WeirdJohn12
Agreed with before the debate:	-	-	0 points
Agreed with after the debate:	-	-	0 points
Who had better conduct:	-	-	1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:	-	-	1 point
Made more convincing arguments:	-	-	3 points
Used the most reliable sources:	-	-	2 points
Total points awarded:	0	0

Reasons for voting decision: this was just a poor debate. no sources, grammar sucked

Vote Placed by thedude346 2 years ago

	SuperDanyluk	WeirdJohn12	Tied
Agreed with before the debate:	-	-		0 points
Agreed with after the debate:	-		-	0 points
Who had better conduct:	-	-		1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:	-		-	1 point
Made more convincing arguments:	-		-	3 points
Used the most reliable sources:	-	-		2 points
Total points awarded:	0	4

Reasons for voting decision: Con made coherent, logical arguments. Pro couldn't keep a single train of thought, was all over the place. But the whole thing could've been longer.

Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 2 years ago

	SuperDanyluk	WeirdJohn12	Tied
Agreed with before the debate:	-	-		0 points
Agreed with after the debate:	-	-		0 points
Who had better conduct:	-	-		1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:	-		-	1 point
Made more convincing arguments:	-	-		3 points
Used the most reliable sources:	-	-		2 points
Total points awarded:	0	1

Reasons for voting decision: Pro had little warrant and needs to be beaten with a dictshunairey.

Vote Placed by Haasenfeffor 2 years ago

	SuperDanyluk	WeirdJohn12	Tied
Agreed with before the debate:	-		-	0 points
Agreed with after the debate:	-		-	0 points
Who had better conduct:	-	-		1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:	-	-		1 point
Made more convincing arguments:	-		-	3 points
Used the most reliable sources:	-		-	2 points
Total points awarded:	0	5

Reasons for voting decision: wow..... fail?

Vote Placed by Zealous1 2 years ago

	SuperDanyluk	WeirdJohn12	Tied
Agreed with before the debate:	-		-	0 points
Agreed with after the debate:	-		-	0 points
Who had better conduct:	-	-		1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:	-		-	1 point
Made more convincing arguments:	-		-	3 points
Used the most reliable sources:	-	-		2 points
Total points awarded:	0	4

Reasons for voting decision: Sorry, but this was a really lame debate. First off because there was some really bad grammar on the Pro side, but also because the character limit must have been low and the argumentation was really weak. Pro was just claiming the gun could disintegrate a lightsaber, while Con claimed the lightsaber is invincible. I didn't really get Pro's argument. Con was right in saying that blasters bounce off. Which one is right? Use a higher char limit next time, at least.