Steroid legalization in MLB

Sure, I accept.
As PRO, I will be arguing for the legalization of steroids in the MLB
As CON, my opponent must be arguing against the legalization of steroids in the MLB

MLB is Major Leage Baseball.
Legalization, by which I mean players are allowed to use steroids without consequence in game.

I'll give it to the instigator to present his opening arguments as to why steroid legalization in the MLB is a bad thing.

To you, CON.

First I'll start with a complete refutation of my opponent's points:

I don't believe that steroids should be legalized, no matter how many people say they should be. When I think of steroids, I think of a horrible, life-threatening drug.

It seems that what you're trying to say here is that steroids are health hazarads. I agree. However, there is still the option of not taking steroids. The resolution is merely the legalization of steroids in major league baseball, and players could choose to not take steroids, or take them, if they desire, but that is their choice. It is the same with cigarettes. You can choose to smoke ore not smoke. It is life-threatening as well. Ultimately, it is up to the player if they want to risk their health for steroids. It is the freedom of choice.

If anything, I believe the amounts of tests should be increased. Also, the penalties for testing positive should be much more enforced as well as serious. Now, as for all of you out there who still think they should be legal, just imagine yourself as an MLB player, How bad would you feel if you tested positive and were suspended? I know I wouldn't be that thrilled.

Now, this point is all about being suspended for steroids. However, CON fails to recognize that if they were legal, then no one would be suspended for taking steroids, as it would be perfectly legitimate. Therefore, this point falls.

My Points

1.

Now, I feel like CON is going to say that it is unfair to others if you take steroids, as it gives an advantage, which is the main reason it is banned today. However, everyone will have access to steroids, as it is legal. If everyone are able to take steroids, no one will have an advantage over anyone else. Therefore, steroids should be lega.


2.

With steroids, MLB would be so much more intersting. Faster sprinting, harder bats, better catches. This would attract many more fans, and in turn raise revenues. Many teams, like the Blue Jays, are dying off, with not enough fans to support them. If players could use steroids, they would attract more fans, and thus save the jobs of many.

Conclusion

All of CON's points were refuted fully.
My points are as of yet uncontested.

Vote PRO

Okay, it looks like my opponent has dropped all my points.

Yes, yes, we all know about people who die of drugs. But who's fault is that? I already stated that it is a choice. Whether or not you make it illegal, players will still take steroids, it is inevitable. It's like how people take illicit drugs. These people know the consequence of the drug, yet they still take it. It's their choice that they want to harm their health.

Extend arguments, please vote for PRO