The Instigator
Blackhawk42
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
gwhit123
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

String Orchestra>Band

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/28/2014 Category: Funny
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 675 times Debate No: 44763
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

Blackhawk42

Pro

This debate is just for fun. The debate is over whether orchestra is better than band. Since this debate is just casual, feel free to use any kind of argument (even really stupid ones). No sources are required. A few notes about the debate:
  • Round 1 is just acceptance.
  • Keep the arguments, however stupid, appropriate
  • Have fun!
Debate Round No. 1
Blackhawk42

Pro

Blackhawk42 forfeited this round.
gwhit123

Con

gwhit123 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Blackhawk42

Pro

I apologize for the random forfeiting.



Anyways, onto the arguments.

WHY ORCHESTRA IS BETTER THAN BAND:
1. String instruments can play TWO NOTES AT ONCE. WOW. OH MY GOSH. EPIC.
2. While yes, band is loud, which can be epic, it is OBNOXIOUSLY loud. Nobody in Kazakhstan likes being woken up by a band concert in Florida.
3. COME TO ORCHESTRA. WE HAVE STRINGS.
4. You know what word sounds a lot like "band?" Banned. Coincidence? I think not.
5. Band is way too complicated for music. Orchestra keeps it simple. Five sections.
6. Band needs to get out there and march in formation to match orchetra's awesomeness.

I end my speech, and now I give the spotlight to Con.
gwhit123

Con

gwhit123 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Blackhawk42

Pro

Blackhawk42 forfeited this round.
gwhit123

Con

gwhit123 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.