The Instigator
SuburbiaSurvivor
Pro (for)
Winning
9 Points
The Contender
jawyer
Con (against)
Losing
8 Points

SuburbiaSurvivor's Opponent Should Win This Debate

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
SuburbiaSurvivor
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/21/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 777 times Debate No: 21333
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (6)

 

SuburbiaSurvivor

Pro

I really think you should win.

If I can convince the audience that you should win, then I win. If you convince the audience that I should win, then you win.

BOP is shared.

Let the games begin!
jawyer

Con

i accept. :D
Debate Round No. 1
SuburbiaSurvivor

Pro

I thank my clearly superior opponent for accepting!

Con's Profile Picture Reflects On His Clearly Stellar Personality

I may not know very many ladies, because I live in my mom's basement and I don't get out much. But I do know that ladies love a snappy dresser. Con's choice of profile picture clearly shows his desire to appear classy, and the microphone in front of his avatars head shows that he has a love for public speaking. I would go so far as to suggest that Con may go into politics one day and become a very influential senator!

Con Is From London, And Should Win For His Accent Alone

English accents are probably the coolest, classiest, and mostest stellar accents in the world. (See video).The video has other accents, but still. English accents are boss.

Con Has An Overall Cheery Disposition

After he accepted this debate, he put a smiley face! People who do not have cheery dispositions do not put smiley faces after they accept a debate.

Con Is Open-Minded About Most Controversial Issues

Con's profile shows that he is undecided for all controversial issues. This is good because as someone who is open-minded, he will vote fairly. A lot of you have bee complaining about being votebombed. Well, don't worry about that coming from Con! Con is partial either way. He will only vote for the person he thinks is convincing.

Con Should Win So He Will Stay On DDO

Con's profile shows that he only has one finished debate. That debate was a tie. If Con does not start winning, it's very likely that he will leave the site! We do not want to discourage this clearly stellar, cheerful, english-accent speaking individual away from our comunity.

If I Win You Will Encourage Bad Behavior

Right now there are other things I should be doing. Like schoolwork, chores, I could be looking for a job. But being on DDO is distracting me from that. You must choose Con to discourage me from my irresponsible bahvior

Conclusion: Con Should Win This Debate
jawyer

Con

jawyer forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
SuburbiaSurvivor

Pro

Clearly by my opponents forfeit, he is admitting that he thinks he should win! My opponent and I are in agreement. Con is a boss, and should win this debate.

(Btw, if I convince you that Con should win, then I've won.)
jawyer

Con

Con did not respond because he had nothing to say, pro had made him speechless. Pro is so awesome and cool. Pro is a nice person (unlike me) I am miserable sad loner. So VOTE FOR PRO because he is clearly a stronger opponent and has AMAZING debate skills. He came up with so many GREAT points and explained them SO well and clearly addressing the audience. He clearly is a better opponent and I'm sure he's a genious. Pro is also a person full of great ideas. One example of this is this very debate (WHAT A GREAT IDEA FOR THIS FUN, INTERESTING, DIFFERENT DEBATE!!)

Conclusion: Don't vote for Con, vote for PRO! because he is a pro at debating.

PRO FOR THE WIN!!! XD
Debate Round No. 3
SuburbiaSurvivor

Pro

I thank Con for a stellar response!

First of all, I would like to point out Con's incredible humility. There are not many people on this site who would admit that they are miserable sad loners. In fact, there are not many people in general who would point out that they are miserable sad loners. Con's willingness to give the vote to me is also outstanding! He's literally advocating for me to win.

Here are my continued arguments for why Con should win this debate:

I. Con Is Passionate

As you can see by his style of writing, Con is clearly passionate! His use of capitalized letters further emphasize his conviction of his cause. If anything, Con should win solely for his passion.

II. Con Is A Boss

P1: Con is Con.
P2: All Cons in this debate are bosses.
P3: You can not be a boss and not be a boss at the same time.
P4: Con is in this debate.
P5: Therefore, Con is a boss.

My infallible logic has proven that Con is in this debate.

III. It Is Morally Wrong For Bosses Not To Win This Debate

P1: It is morally wrong not to vote for someone who hasn't given the best argument.
P2: Bosses always give the best arguments because of reasons.
P3: Con is a boss.
P4: It is morally wrong not to vote for Con.

The only way to refute this argument is to reject objective morality. Of course, if we reject morality, then we can do whatever we want. If I rejected objective morality, I could kill all of the voters and it would be okay because morality is subjective and according to my perception of morality it is morally wrong NOT to kill people who I don't like.

So since we can't reject objective morality because it would mean we could kill anyone and it would be okay, my argument wins.

IV. Vote For Con For The Greater Good

P1: It is good to do things that make people happy.
P2: Making people happy is a greater good then not making people happy.
P3: Voting for Con will make Con and me happy.
P4: Since it will make us happy it is for the greater good.
P5: If you are a utilitarian then you know what I mean.
P6: Vote Con.

III. Chuck Norris Likes Con

This facebook page proves that Chuck Norris likes Con. https://www.facebook.com...

IV. Con Is Clever And Punny

Did you see how Con cleverly used my debating position to compliment me? "Don't vote for Con, vote for PRO! Because he is a pro at debating"

This further proves my point, that Con is an extremely creative individual, and should win this debate! I suck at puns. Con does not suck at puns. BAM. Vote CON!
jawyer

Con

jawyer forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by SuburbiaSurvivor 5 years ago
SuburbiaSurvivor
DISCLAIMER: The person who convinces the audience that his opponent should win wins the debate. So even if after reading this debate you think Con should win, that means I've done my job, and I win.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by WriterDave 5 years ago
WriterDave
SuburbiaSurvivorjawyerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Rescinded.
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 5 years ago
1dustpelt
SuburbiaSurvivorjawyerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: In order for Pro to win, he must lose! Con had worse conduct because of forfeits, bad grammar, and horrible arguments, and no sources.
Vote Placed by ConservativePolitico 5 years ago
ConservativePolitico
SuburbiaSurvivorjawyerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: FF for Conduct
Vote Placed by KeytarHero 5 years ago
KeytarHero
SuburbiaSurvivorjawyerTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con because Con forfeited, so Pro should win the conduct point, so therefore because Pro should get the conduct point, Con actually gets it. Arguments go to Pro since he showed that Con is a boss, and since Chuck Norris likes Con, I don't want to argue with a man who doesn't push himself up from a pushup, he pushes the ground down.
Vote Placed by kyro90 5 years ago
kyro90
SuburbiaSurvivorjawyerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: This actually REALLY confused me but since Pro had more typing im giving him points.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
SuburbiaSurvivorjawyerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: FF for conduct. The rest you cannot vote on as well if he ought to win I will give him points, if I do not then pro ought to win. Its a paradox that is un debatable, so he was lucky for the FF