The Instigator
Ryanmax203
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Zarroette
Con (against)
Winning
25 Points

Super Bowl 2015 The Packers will win

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
Zarroette
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/18/2015 Category: Sports
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 686 times Debate No: 68516
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (7)

 

Ryanmax203

Pro

The packers will win the super bowl because they have Aaron Rodgers, Eddy Lacy, and Jordy Nelson.
Zarroette

Con

I accept. I await Pro's opening round of arguments.
Debate Round No. 1
Ryanmax203

Pro

Ryanmax203 forfeited this round.
Zarroette

Con

My opponent cannot win without making an argument that confirms without a doubt that the Packers will win. So far, my opponent has used a non-sequitur in arguing that because the Packers have certain players, they will win. Is it true that any team with excellent players has never lost? I trust the audience to see the absurdity in this claim. Thus, the resolution remains unaffirmed.
Debate Round No. 2
Ryanmax203

Pro

Ryanmax203 forfeited this round.
Zarroette

Con

Pro needed to provide arguments to affirm the resolution. Pro has not done so. Hence, I win this debate by default.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
@ButterCat

You want to debate that?
Posted by ButterCatX 2 years ago
ButterCatX
The patriots are going to win because they are a very skilled team with great synergy between players and coaches.
Posted by RevNge 2 years ago
RevNge
Noob snipin' ftw
Posted by NNEye 2 years ago
NNEye
One can decimate this debate by arguing semantics, i.e., against the certainty of the Packers winning the 2015 Super Bowl rather than merely the possibility of.
Posted by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
Welcome to the site.

You may want to support your case with more than names, for example I recently had a debate on the same basic subject: http://www.debate.org...
The player names result in certain number of points scored, measured against points allowed (the other team scoring).

For example, the Packers had a greater margin of victory in the divisional playoff round, than the Patriots. http://www.nfl.com...
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
Ryanmax203ZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Con. Con forfeited multiple rounds in this debate, which is rarely acceptable conduct. S&G - Tie. Both had adequate spelling and grammar. Arguments - Con. Pro failed to meet his BOP by providing no proof whatsoever to affirm his claims that the Packers will win. Due to the utter lack of maintaining the BOP, and failing to rise to the challenge of doing so as given by Con, Con wins arguments. Sources - Tie. Neither utilized sources in this debate.
Vote Placed by Tweka 2 years ago
Tweka
Ryanmax203ZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by ButterCatX 2 years ago
ButterCatX
Ryanmax203ZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Zarroette put up a better argument.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
Ryanmax203ZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
Ryanmax203ZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Paleophyte 2 years ago
Paleophyte
Ryanmax203ZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeits
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 2 years ago
dsjpk5
Ryanmax203ZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Ff by pro. As oro and the instigator, he had bop. He never made an argument that wasn't a logical fallacy.