The Instigator
johnsterdude
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points
The Contender
swagman6868
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

Super foods should be free.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
swagman6868
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/29/2014 Category: Health
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 524 times Debate No: 64155
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

johnsterdude

Pro

Super foods should be free to all citizens. Those who can't afford food will wind up starving and die.
swagman6868

Con

You sir are dumb... Apart from that if food is free how are the farmers supposed to make money in the world? Why would the farmers work if they have no profit out of it? How are they supposed to pay for the things that are necessary in life, like a home, or family? If food is free that means there is no demand and with no demand the supply goes down and profits. If you can't get ahead why try in life. On top of that more people would go into starvation because farmers are not...
Debate Round No. 1
johnsterdude

Pro

For 1 I'm not dumb and younglionn has a point for the helpless starving from lack of food.
swagman6868

Con

Younglion is a retard and so are you. You obviously don't know anything about the government and economics.
Debate Round No. 2
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Bubbagump282 2 years ago
Bubbagump282
In response to swagman6868 and Younglion5900's comments:
You are absolutely correct. Unless this is a PERFECT COMMUNISM (no starving, everyone gets what they need) this won't work. However, nobody has ever even witnessed a perfect communism. The government has zero dollars. Scratch that. Less than zero.

The government can't afford to pay for what they've been paying for since WWII. This simply isn't sustainable.
Posted by swagman6868 2 years ago
swagman6868
Look if you haven't noticed the government is in 14$ trillion dollars in debt. We can't pay for teachers, let alone food. Do you want this to be a communist country where nobody keeps what they earn and the government just distributes everything.
Posted by Younglion5900 2 years ago
Younglion5900
honestly I think lil man is rite I mena the government has a lot of money why not help the needy unless they try to have a purge which would be wrong
Posted by Bubbagump282 2 years ago
Bubbagump282
Without citizens paying for their foods, who is paying the farmers for their duties other than the government? Even then, who is paying the government to pay the farmers? Taxpayers. Either way we will be paying for the people's food, so why not just pay for your own?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Luxray2854 2 years ago
Luxray2854
johnsterdudeswagman6868Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: The insults are real man.
Vote Placed by Imperfiect 2 years ago
Imperfiect
johnsterdudeswagman6868Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: conduct for the insults. arguments because johnster was relying on some random guy's opinion for his entire argument base don 0 reasoning whereas Con had non-rebuked refutations.