The Instigator
hannibal
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TheUser
Con (against)
Winning
21 Points

THBT African Americans are racists.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
TheUser
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/30/2013 Category: Funny
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 769 times Debate No: 43124
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (6)

 

hannibal

Pro

To all my niggas, nothing personal dawg, I believe that African Americans are racists because they like to use the word honkey/honky6 (in general) to white people. That is not all homie. They call other African Americans niggers, why? As you know my homies, not all African Americans came from the same tribes in Africa.

Anyways, I love to see the usage of street languages in this debate.

This is Hannibal, you better recognize fool!
TheUser

Con

Though I am not an African American, I will be taking Con side of this debate.

You say that ALL African Americans are racist. As we know, that is not at all true. Think about the Africans who are priests or Presidents. Would you see them calling their people "homie" and "crackers"? Not at all.

"Not all African Americans came from the same tribes"

Most African Americans descended from West African countries.Studies indicate ALL of us may have originated in Africa long before tribes existed. True, some may be racist, but that does not honor God. God made us to take care of each other and not to be racists.

You also state you want some street language in this debate.

I will not use any because I am not one to curse or use street language.

Good luck to my opponent and I hope to hear from you soon.
Debate Round No. 1
hannibal

Pro

hannibal forfeited this round.
TheUser

Con

My opponent has forfeited because he set a 2 hour limit for responding. He really should have set it to 72 hours so that this could have been a fair debate. I wish my opponent comes back for the next round.

I also noticed he put this debate in the Funny debates.
Debate Round No. 2
hannibal

Pro

hannibal forfeited this round.
TheUser

Con

I will reinstate my points.

We might have all originated from Africa at some point. I did not use any street language just because Hannibal wanted it.

He might have not been able to respond because he set a 2 hour limit.

Gl and may the best debater win.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by TheUser 3 years ago
TheUser
I meant he should have had longer time limits.
Posted by TheUser 3 years ago
TheUser
Pro should have had longer rounds
Posted by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
Is this debate aimed at them all? Or merely saying humans have the ability to be racist, regardless of skin color?
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by iamanatheistandthisiswhy 3 years ago
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
hannibalTheUserTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gets points for spelling and conduct. I don't want to award argument points, as they both seemed to miss important factors, such as what are the meaning attributed to street language. The time limit should have been longer if Pro wanted to take the debate seriously. Well done Con.
Vote Placed by Timelord48 3 years ago
Timelord48
hannibalTheUserTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision:
Vote Placed by Matt_L 3 years ago
Matt_L
hannibalTheUserTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeiting gives Con the conduct point. Con had more rational arguments which gives him the convincing argument points.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
hannibalTheUserTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture. .. seems to have been a short round time limit error.
Vote Placed by Skepticalone 3 years ago
Skepticalone
hannibalTheUserTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeits. I was hoping this would be funny. Alas, it was not to be.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
hannibalTheUserTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit and rude language by pro