THBT Earth Hour is useless
Defintion of Terms
Earth Hour is a worldwide event organized by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and held towards the end of March annually, encouraging households and businesses to turn off their non-essential lights for one hour to raise awareness about the need to take action on climate change(Wikipedia)
Useless means that the objective is not really achieved effectively, that it creates more harm than good.
Contention: Although Earth hour has noble intentions of raising environmental awareness, I believe that it lacks effectiveness of achieving its said goal, thus I believe that it is useless.
I will expand my arguments later.
I would like to say that at this point anything to help the environment is worth it. Though this may be "useless" it helps, and thus is worth it. Plus, what harm is it doing to others? Is it hurting anyone? No. Is it insulting people? Bringing riots? No. So why get ride of it? If people want to do this, then i say let them. We have no right no matter were you are in the world you simply just cant make someone do something when it is not hurting you or anyone else.
Thank you for your questions.
I will focus on your question as to why earth hour is useless.
Firstly, I recognize that Earth hour has good intentions in changing the attitudes of the people towards climate change. But those intentions are not actually realized. According to Jeremy Clarkson, host of the BBC motoring programme Top Gear, confessed to switching on all electrical items in his home as a protest against the perceived impact of Earth Hour, claiming the event would have little to no effect on attitudes towards climate change.
Secondly, there is an increase of carbon dioxide emission because of people using candles instead. In fact The Christian Science Monitor said that most candles are made from paraffin, a heavy hydrocarbon derived from crude oil, a fossil fuel, and that depending on how many candles a person burns (if one uses candles during Earth Hour), whether or not they normally use compact fluorescent light bulbs, and what source of energy is used to produce their electricity, in some cases, replacing light bulbs with candles will cause an increase, instead of a decrease, in carbon dioxide emissions.Also, In March 2010, the Daily Telegraph quoted electricity experts that "it could therefore result in an increase in carbon emissions" due to complications related to rapidly lowering then raising electricity generation.
Lastly, accidents often happen during the celebration of earth hour. During the 2010 Earth Hour in the city of Uusikaupunki in Finland, a 17-year-old female motorcyclist hit a 71-year-old man, who was walking on the street instead of the sidewalk for an unknown reason. The man died from his injuries, while the motorcyclist and her passenger were uninjured. At the time of the accident the street lights had been turned off as part of the Earth Hour. The police stated that the lack of street lighting may have played a part in the accident, while the mayor believed the city's street lights would have been too dim to prevent it even if they had been on.
The Times (London)http://www.timesonline.co.uk...
McKitrick, Ross (2009). "Earth Hour: A Dissent". Retrieved March 31, 2012.
"Earth Hour 'will not cut carbon emissions'". The Daily Telegraph (London). 2010-03-27.
"Kaupunki sammutti katuvalot Earth Hourin ajaksi – Mies jäi moottoripyörän alle pimeällä tiellä ja kuoli". Aamulehti (in Finnish). 28 March 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-28.
Thank you :)
I made clear in this debate that I am not proposing to stop Earth hour, but only to devalue it because I stated that its purpose is not really achieved. Yet I am not saying that it does not have good effects, but then again as I have provided expert opinions and statistics proving that earth hour is not that effective, well this debate must go on.
Orion12 forfeited this round.