The Instigator
thsrbwls
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
leandro.sanchez
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

THBT we should abolish special purpose schools.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/18/2013 Category: Education
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,324 times Debate No: 36762
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (7)
Votes (0)

 

thsrbwls

Con

No way! Yes there are problems but it is no reason to abolish it! Special purpose schools such as international schools or foreign language schools and many other provide people with high education but by abolishing it our country will b brain drained and then what will happen! We will lose the brains!!!!!!!!!!!
leandro.sanchez

Pro

First what country shoudnt abolish special purpose schools.you didnt specefie so i will talk in a word scalle.
Statement ( We will lose the brains!!!!!!!!!!!)how is we what counrie.
now my argument:in chilie the private schools where so much better than the public one that it created unfairness when the peopel where searching for jobs.the employeurs always choosed the studiants with the private schoul diplom ,making it such a problem thath chilie considerd privitaze the schools of the country for make up for the un-ballence.so privette scholls can create political un balenc in a country proved by the mass protests in chili not so long ago, foreign language schools are freaking usseless what better to learn a language to be surounded by peopel how talk the language.international schools are a injust because ussually there students get better carrer paths because it ussually in most country has good reputation because the ministers sons are there ,so you give students more chances to get jobs because wath their father do for a living?
all students should have a new beginnig
Debate Round No. 1
thsrbwls

Con

thsrbwls forfeited this round.
leandro.sanchez

Pro

no,answer by my opponent i suposse he has no objections to my statememts and refusal
Debate Round No. 2
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by HenryGBR 4 years ago
HenryGBR
I would have done this debate, but I feel that 700 characters is far too little for a good argument; it is, however, such an interesting motion.
Posted by thsrbwls 4 years ago
thsrbwls
Private
Posted by thsrbwls 4 years ago
thsrbwls
Private
Posted by thsrbwls 4 years ago
thsrbwls
Private
Posted by InVinoVeritas 4 years ago
InVinoVeritas
Private or public or both?
Posted by mrsatan 4 years ago
mrsatan
Yea.... 750 characters? Not acceptable for a solid argument. If you ask me, there should be no character limit option, it should just be a flat 8,000 char limit, or higher if the website can support it.
Posted by rajun 4 years ago
rajun
not enough characters to argue here..// why are the new users doing such things?
No votes have been placed for this debate.