The Instigator
natho_thebrainz
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
RainbowDash52
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

THW resurrect Albert Einstein instead of resurrecting the man who was about to cure cancer

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
RainbowDash52
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/18/2016 Category: Health
Updated: 12 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 321 times Debate No: 86793
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

natho_thebrainz

Pro

Ladies first xD
RainbowDash52

Con

Note: I will abbreviate "the man who was about to cure cancer" as TMWWATCC

I will be arguing that it would be better to resurrect TMWWATCC than to resurrect Albert Einstein.

I will keep this first round short by only covering the obvious reason why resurrecting TMWWATCC would be very good and wait for my opponent to give reasons why resurrecting Einstein would be good before I give rebuttals.

Reason for resurrecting TMWWATCC

13% of all deaths are caused by cancer. [1]
resurrecting TMWWATCC would allow him to finish his cure for cancer, which will prevent those 13% of future deaths.
Preventing deaths is good, therefor it would be very good to resurrect TMWWATCC.

I look forward to my opponent's response on why resurrecting Einstein would be better than preventing 13% of future deaths.

Source:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 1
natho_thebrainz

Pro

natho_thebrainz forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
natho_thebrainz

Pro

natho_thebrainz forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by whiteflame 11 months ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: Ragnar// Mod action: NOT Removed<

4 points to Con (Conduct, Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: One one side with arguments to weight, and that 13% figure was incredibly effective. FF for conduct. And with only one source used there's not enough of a lead on that to award for it.

[*Reason for non-removal*] Full forfeit debates are not moderated unless the voter votes for the side that did the forfeiting.
************************************************************************
Posted by whiteflame 11 months ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: lannan13// Mod action: NOT Removed<

4 points to Con (Conduct, Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con due to the forfeiture. Con wins arguments since Con was the only one who provided an argument in this debate.

[*Reason for non-removal*] Full forfeit debates are not moderated unless the voter votes for the side that did the forfeiting.
************************************************************************
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 11 months ago
lannan13
natho_thebrainzRainbowDash52Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con due to the forfeiture. Con wins arguments since Con was the only one who provided an argument in this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 12 months ago
Ragnar
natho_thebrainzRainbowDash52Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: One one side with arguments to weight, and that 13% figure was incredibly effective. FF for conduct. And with only one source used there's not enough of a lead on that to award for it.