TROLL DEBATE: Ray Comfort's banana argument is invalid
Debate Rounds (5)
First round is acceptance only
Invalid- false due to basis on information and/or erronous reasoning.
Ray Comfort's Banana argument- an argument used by Ray Comfort for theism that claims that the banana's nutritional value, ease of use, and "color couding" to be irrefutable evidence that God made it.
1. EVIL USES FOR BANANAS
Bananas can be used for the following evil purposes....
AS CLIPS FOR YOUR AK-47
AS THROWING WEAPONS
Under "Boomerang," it says "flip a coin. If heads the defending pokemon is now confused."
AND THE CLASSIC ONE WE ALL KNOW... MAKING PEOPLE TRIP
3/4 of these uses can result in the loss of a human life, and is thus killing. But the 2nd commandment says not to kill. Why would God do that?
2. THEY SPOIL TOO SOON
you can make a banana last 2-3 months by putting it in the freezer, but you barely have any room in the freezer because everything else you need to put in the freezer. However, they only last 2-7 days on the counter and 2-9 in the fridge.  Back in Biblical times, they had no way to freeze their food, so knowing they would try to store it, God made them to rot so soon on purpose so he could laugh at them when they saw their reactions when they saw their food had spoiled.
These are all very important facts that Comfort left out. So according to him, God "intelligently designed" a food that rots too fast, can be used for various evil purposes doesn't store much in the fridge, and was made to f*ck with his own people. Or was that Satan that did that? Was it not God, but the devil that made it just to mess with theists just to mess with them? Was he thinking that by doing that, Atheists could use that as an argument and it would make them go "WHAT THE.. NO. GOD WOULDN'T DO THAT"
Wow. Thanks for ruining my debate.
*flips you off*
I has a disappoint
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Wylted 1 year ago
|Who won the debate:||-|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was the only one to make arguments
Vote Placed by AngelofDeath 1 year ago
|Who won the debate:||-||-|
Reasons for voting decision: trexfire trolled better, imo, but had no arguments
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 1 year ago
|Who won the debate:||-|
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't really use any arguments. Just because it's a troll debate doesn't mean it's a contest for who trolls harder.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.