The Instigator
Zaradi
Pro (for)
Winning
11 Points
The Contender
felixgriffin
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Targeted killing is a morally permissible foreign policy tool

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Zaradi
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/11/2012 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,029 times Debate No: 21897
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

Zaradi

Pro

Resolved: Targeted killing is a morally permissible foreign policy tool.

As this is the current LD topic for March/April, I would like this to be as closely structured to an LD debate as possible. All styles of LD cases are acceptable, you don't have to run a traditional value-criterion case.

Rounds will break down like this.

1. Acceptance from both sides.
2. Pro case, con case and rebuttals.
3. Pro rebuttals and defense against con arguments. Con rebuttals and defense against pro arguments.
4. Pro rebuttal and defend. Con rebuttal and defend. No new arguments.

For cases, it's okay if you want to put them in a google document in order to conserve space. Rebuttals must be typed up in the text box alloted by DDO. If you need more than 8,000 characters for rebuttals, then you're probably saying too much.

Good luck to whomever accepts.
felixgriffin

Con

May the best man win.
Debate Round No. 1
Zaradi

Pro

From looking at some of your previous debates, it is possible that you could be trolling this debate. I do hope that this isn't the case. In any way, my case is provided in the google document below.
https://docs.google.com...#
felixgriffin

Con

Too long didn't read. If someone's a faggot you'd obviously send some spies off to kill them
Debate Round No. 2
Zaradi

Pro

-.-
For some reason, I saw this coming.
Fail troll is fail.
felixgriffin

Con

felixgriffin forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Zaradi

Pro

Extend all arguments, as predicted.
felixgriffin

Con

felixgriffin forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Zaradi 4 years ago
Zaradi
Yeah, i didn't put my cites on there because I don't want people just stealing the cards from me. If people need to see the cites, I can send them to it, but I don't want some joe-shmoe guy from the interwebs coming onto here and seeing a free K and stealing it.
Posted by Layne-vs-Kagan 4 years ago
Layne-vs-Kagan
1. it's cool that you're putting LD up in here, I started the same debate ^^
2. you need actual cites lol you can't just give one name (I didn't see the rest, forgive me if there is stuff there)
3. this is a bad place for LD...just saying. I realized that after having to cut my case down to four cards >< K debate would suck here
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Buddamoose 4 years ago
Buddamoose
ZaradifelixgriffinTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Fail troll is fail
Vote Placed by airmax1227 4 years ago
airmax1227
ZaradifelixgriffinTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: FF