The Instigator
Yavneh
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
iTruthSeeker
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Team Debate: Judaism (Pro) vs. Christianity (Con)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/23/2016 Category: Religion
Updated: 11 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,494 times Debate No: 86903
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (108)
Votes (0)

 

Yavneh

Pro

Bs"D

Teams:
Pro: Yavneh, Rami, and anyone else who wishes to accept.
Con: Whoever accepts, plus 1-4 others who they choose.

The debate is defined as trying to prove that either Judaism (defined as Orthodox) or Christianity (whichever sect Con wants, or a group of sects) is more valid than the other. Teams will collaborate on a Google doc to form arguments, rebuttals, etc., and the team member who accepted will post the shared link.

Round 1 is acceptance and list of team members; afterwards, each team argues at their own pace (though no new arguments are allowed in the final round).

Hoping for a good debate.
iTruthSeeker

Con

Accepting for Con (Christianity)

Team:
1).ITruthSeeker
2).Nivek
3).Nawl
4).Jerry943

I look forward to this debate.. Let the games begin!
Debate Round No. 1
Yavneh

Pro

Bs"D
With due credit given to my four teammates, here is the link (It was too many characters to copy and paste):
https://docs.google.com...
Thank you for reading!
iTruthSeeker

Con

Here is the well awaited link:
https://docs.google.com...

I thank my teammates for their participation.

Debate Round No. 2
Yavneh

Pro

Thank you to Con for your arguments.
Thank you to my teammates (who did basically all of the work ;).
Thank you to Rami for the vote of no confidence (see Comments).
Here is our round 3 link:
https://docs.google.com...
Enjoy!
iTruthSeeker

Con

Here is our rebuttal:
https://docs.google.com...

Nawl has decided to quit the team by not responding to our messages.. We could not object to everything we planned on due to this inconvience.. We will respond to your further objections in the first rebuttal next round

Thanks to my teamates for their effort and support.
Debate Round No. 3
Yavneh

Pro

Yavneh forfeited this round.
iTruthSeeker

Con

Here is our Round 4 rebuttal:
https://docs.google.com...

Pro's Instigator (Yavneh) was not availible to post their argument due to certain reasons.. We will be posting their Round 4 rebuttal as well at this link:
https://docs.google.com...

We trust that team Pro did not insert any more arguments/rebuttals after the time limit was reached..

Thanks to my team for participating and giving well thought out arguments. Cheers to the final round!


Debate Round No. 4
Yavneh

Pro

Thank you to Con for a good debate, and for posting our argument when I ran into the Sabbath.
Sorry to the readers for our forfeit last time.
Finally, a huge thank you to my teammates, who made this debate happen: Rami, Harrytruman, Talmid, and (last but by no means least) CapAhab. You were amazing to work with.

Here is our argument: https://docs.google.com...

Please do not edit, by the way, because my teammate has not yet put it on 'view'. All edits will be easily reversible.

Thank you to everyone for a great debate, and we hope we earned your vote!
iTruthSeeker

Con

Alright here is our final argument:
https://docs.google.com...

Thanks to everyone for their participation in this debate! This is by far, the most extensive debate I have participated in on this site and am well pleased to have shared it with you all!

God bless!
Debate Round No. 5
108 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by iTruthSeeker 10 months ago
iTruthSeeker
Im up!
Posted by CapAhab 10 months ago
CapAhab
I'm up for a team continuation debate... Who's up?
Posted by iTruthSeeker 10 months ago
iTruthSeeker
Who said I was gonna take you on alone? I wouldn't mind doing a 1v1 if your up for it
Posted by Rami 10 months ago
Rami
Well, You might be the only person on this sight that reads the debate settings before accepting. We had two other cases where hotshots try to take us all at once.
Posted by iTruthSeeker 10 months ago
iTruthSeeker
Anybody up for a round 2? I got time :)
Posted by Jerry947 11 months ago
Jerry947
Thanks to my team mates and thanks to the opponents. That was a really neat debate in which I hope everyone learned something.
Posted by Nivek 11 months ago
Nivek
The doc is fine. It's taxing enough to have you do all those. Anyway, thanks to my team for working diligently and thanks to truth for formulating everything from R1 to R5. In addition, the reminders he made were also useful and thank you Jerry for carrying the arguments. My only contribution is about 4 pages, lol. Alas, I hope you have a better team for part 2. Good luck.
Posted by iTruthSeeker 11 months ago
iTruthSeeker
I think the non-team voting is a given, but I will agree to it.

I would be up for a round 2 sometime in the future... I need some time to rest and re-calibrate from our last round XD
Posted by CapAhab 11 months ago
CapAhab
That makes sense...
Posted by Yavneh 11 months ago
Yavneh
Can we make an official no-teammates-vote policy?
No votes have been placed for this debate.