The Instigator
CharlesLawrence
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
debate_freak
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Tell Me Why This Would Not Be Optimal for Economic Reform

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/5/2015 Category: Economics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 189 times Debate No: 77290
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)

 

CharlesLawrence

Pro

PISCES will be used to research and implement the following goal: to start a reaction that will create upward mobility for any and all that have a steady income while creating a perpetually integrated cumulative economy.

How The System Works

Relationships are established with all of the major goods and services entities. Wal-Mart, Nationwide, Toyota, Sprint, etc. etc. Any and all willing to participate are welcome within the Network Market upon approval of their structural integrity.

Consumer Applicants create a socioeconomic landscape via the network input system using every document they have concerning finance and sociological information .

The social landscape is anononymized and assigned a number that is linked to their account within The Network and only within The Network.

The Network analyzes the value of their information based on the projected bids from Commercial organizations for set amounts of socioeconomic information.

The Network assigns the anonymous number a Value (based on their
socioeconomic information) and that Value is the amount of funds that the individual is able to use for goods and services within The Network Market.

The Consumer then circulates that money within The Network and creates more socioeconomic data for themselves thus raising the status of The Network, The Network Market, and The Consumer.

The Network will then be able to assign them more money.
debate_freak

Con

No it's not a real system. Wall of text.
Debate Round No. 1
CharlesLawrence

Pro

CharlesLawrence forfeited this round.
debate_freak

Con

debate_freak forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
CharlesLawrence

Pro

CharlesLawrence forfeited this round.
debate_freak

Con

debate_freak forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
How many websites have you posted this on?
Posted by Forthelulz 1 year ago
Forthelulz
This gem.
"
The Network analyzes the value of their information based on the projected bids from Commercial organizations for set amounts of socioeconomic information.

The Network assigns the anonymous number a Value (based on their
socioeconomic information) and that Value is the amount of funds that the individual is able to use for goods and services within The Network Market.

The Consumer then circulates that money within The Network and creates more socioeconomic data for themselves thus raising the status of The Network, The Network Market, and The Consumer.

The Network will then be able to assign them more money.
"
All I could see was "plutocracy". The system you are detailing is a plutocracy because the "haves" are paid off, presumably on the backs of the "have-nots", simply because they have more money.
Also, I give it an hour, tops, before some cracker gets in and helps themselves to everyone else's data, and therefore money.
Imagine the conversation that happens when someone gets in.
"Uh... Mr. The Plague, uh, something weird's happening on the net."
"As in what, you hapless techno weenie?"
"The accounting subdirectory on the Gibson's working really hard. We got one person online, but the workload's enough for, like, ten users. I think we got a hacker."
No votes have been placed for this debate.