The Instigator
Skanarchy
Pro (for)
Winning
10 Points
The Contender
emmahasavagina
Con (against)
Losing
6 Points

Ten Second Aggression

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/25/2008 Category: Arts
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,036 times Debate No: 3370
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (6)

 

Skanarchy

Pro

Ten SA an awesome band for several reasons.

1. It had the most attractive people in the world.
2. Im sure we utilized a "passing tone" at one time
3. We opened for Agent orange.
4. Punk Rock Girl
5. We piss off wheeler administration
6. We played the MASQ
7. Everyone that didnt know music loved us.
8. We were kind of political.
emmahasavagina

Con

Reasons why we sucked bad:

1. We never EVER practiced efficently
2. Are songs, while catchy, had about all the same chords..and progressions
3. You could never hear us on stage because SOMEBODY had their guitar turned on WAY too loud.
4. David's vocals
5. Emma's drumming
6. Patrick's late-ness
7. Rikko's ego
8. We worried about things too far in advance like, "HEY LETS LIEK MAKE SHIRTS! AND GO ON A TUR!", when we hadn't even written a good set list.
Debate Round No. 1
Skanarchy

Pro

1. We practiced A LOT, for at least a few hours... every sunday unless our drummer was with her BOY FRIEND. God damn. After a year or 2 that counts for something
2. You are right... they were teh same but that just made us better. See also: punk rock http://en.wikipedia.org...
3. That someone didnt have their shenanigans up loud at the masq
4. David's vocals while at times sweet and soft, were also hard and rough like his beard
5. touche.
6. Patrick got better
7. Rikko's ego made our band more awesome.
8. We were ambitious!

EVERYONE LOVED US
WE HAD PASSING TONES
See also Creative loafing

www.georgiamusicdirectory.com/gyrobase/Music/ViewMusicEntry?oid=oid%3A209558

Also youtube, Everyone loved us and we were hard core. that means we had a great FING BANDW.

We pissed off wheeler admins which is basically what this comes down to which she didnt even touch. 10 SA UBER ALLIS
emmahasavagina

Con

emmahasavagina forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by SPENCERJOYAGE14 3 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
SkanarchyemmahasavaginaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Vote Placed by birdpiercefan3334 9 years ago
birdpiercefan3334
SkanarchyemmahasavaginaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Converge 9 years ago
Converge
SkanarchyemmahasavaginaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by DrAlexander 9 years ago
DrAlexander
SkanarchyemmahasavaginaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Skanarchy 9 years ago
Skanarchy
SkanarchyemmahasavaginaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by dumbell2424 9 years ago
dumbell2424
SkanarchyemmahasavaginaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03