The Instigator
ILoveSitarMusic
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
Everything
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

Terminal patients have the right to die with disnity.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Everything
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/27/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 493 times Debate No: 88822
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (2)

 

ILoveSitarMusic

Pro

Pro means I agree, and Con means my opponant disagrees. My opponent will make the first argument.
Everything

Con

What does disnity mean?
Debate Round No. 1
ILoveSitarMusic

Pro

ILoveSitarMusic forfeited this round.
Everything

Con

Everything forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
ILoveSitarMusic

Pro

Did you read what I wrote? I asked whether terminal patients have the right to die with dignaty.
Everything

Con

You asked "Terminal patients have the right to die with disnity."
Debate Round No. 3
ILoveSitarMusic

Pro

ILoveSitarMusic forfeited this round.
Everything

Con

Well I disagree.
Debate Round No. 4
ILoveSitarMusic

Pro

I think terminal patients have the right to die with dignity. It is wrong to force people to suffer.
Everything

Con

What difference does this make? Some asswhole named Whiteflame is going around nullifying peoples' opinions. So fuckhim and fuq to. :)
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Everything 1 year ago
Everything
See what I mean? Fuckin cock sucking no life bastard has nothing better to do then stalk my debates and nullify peoples' opinions.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: FieryNyan// Mod action: Removed<

3 points to Pro (Arguments), 1 point to Con (S&G). Reasons for voting decision: Both people need to work on their spelling and conduct. The reason why I voted for Pro is because he's the only one who stated an argument.

[*Reason for removal*] (1) The voter is reuqired to do more than state that one side was the only one to provide an argument, as it's necessary to state whether or not that argumentwas sufficient to affirm to the resolution. (2) The voter does not explain S&G, as he seems to view this as a tie.
************************************************************************
Posted by ILoveSitarMusic 1 year ago
ILoveSitarMusic
I am visually disabled, so that is too much to read.
Posted by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
I want it to be a 10k character debate. Challenge me.
Posted by WAM 1 year ago
WAM
Disnity? Some wordpicking snipe just waiting to happen...
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by RainbowDash52 1 year ago
RainbowDash52
ILoveSitarMusicEverythingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: The debate was about the right to die with disnity. Pro never explained what disnity meant. Pro eventually stated he meant dignaty which also is not a word, and even if it was, it wouldn't matter since he didn't answer with what he meant in the immediate round after Con asked what disnity meant. Con made it clear in round 1 that he did not know what disnity meant, so he is not at fault for not making an argument. Also since pro had BoP and failed to explain what the resolution meant, Pro by default fails to reach BoP which he had since he instigated. Con gets conduct because Pro forfeited more. S&G is tied because I counted disnity as a unknown word instead of a typo, and "fuckhim and fuq to" was obviously a work-around through the bad word filter.
Vote Placed by Overhead 1 year ago
Overhead
ILoveSitarMusicEverythingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro makes SP mistake in title, Con makes sp mistakes in R5 with "So fuckhim and fuq to". Tie. No sources and no real arguments mean a tie there. Both FF, Pro moreso, but CON's out and out insults in R5. This combined with CON blatantly knowing what PRO meant when he misspelt "dignity" but refusing to engage with the debate in good faith gives Pro the conduct point.