The Instigator
HillmanYusef111
Pro (for)
Winning
22 Points
The Contender
Badtothebone
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

Terrorism Is NOT compatible with Islam

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
HillmanYusef111
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/18/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 857 times Debate No: 33851
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (5)

 

HillmanYusef111

Pro

1. Islam is completely incompatible with acts of terrorism. It is against Islam to kill innocent people.

2. Islam is compatible with democratic principles. The religion itself is a democracy
Badtothebone

Con

what happens when a terrorist is pranked? "AHAHEAHEAHEAHEAHEHA!!!" pause "what's wrong with b-" BOOOM
Debate Round No. 1
HillmanYusef111

Pro

HillmanYusef111 forfeited this round.
Badtothebone

Con

Badtothebone forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
HillmanYusef111

Pro

HillmanYusef111 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Badtothebone 4 years ago
Badtothebone
AgentRocks if you keep going to all my debates i swear
Posted by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
Odd that I could form a hypothetical argument that religion is generally an accidental form of terrorism (by definitions of heaven and hell, along with terrorism not being limited to extreme acts of violence), yet I don't care to try to put down peoples beliefs. I pretty much believe that evil people will justify evil actions by any means, they just sometimes use religion for that. The evil would be there either way.

I look forward to reading the arguments presented here.
Posted by Sleezehead 4 years ago
Sleezehead
And us I'm from the US so my insight of Islam might be too extreme based on the radicals around me.
Posted by Sleezehead 4 years ago
Sleezehead
I'd like to but my knowledge of Islam is rather poor.
Posted by HillmanYusef111 4 years ago
HillmanYusef111
These are good points, want to debate it?
Posted by Sleezehead 4 years ago
Sleezehead
When Israel stops bombing nearby regions, I'll say the religion is incompatible with terrorism.
Posted by Sleezehead 4 years ago
Sleezehead
The second statement is loaded. NK has democratic principles and is simultaniously a terror regime against the almost everyone.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by amey 4 years ago
amey
HillmanYusef111BadtotheboneTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:20 
Reasons for voting decision: pro easily wins since he had started the debate in a proper manner and con did not take the debate seriously and went on posting some nonsensical words so pro wins.
Vote Placed by TheHitchslap 4 years ago
TheHitchslap
HillmanYusef111BadtotheboneTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: FF and conduct. Clear con did not take this seriously
Vote Placed by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
HillmanYusef111BadtotheboneTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:20 
Reasons for voting decision: Troll alert. One that also can't spell.
Vote Placed by AgentRocks 4 years ago
AgentRocks
HillmanYusef111BadtotheboneTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:61 
Reasons for voting decision: You don't have to read, are you kidding? Pro won, this debate was way to easy for pro. Even though he forfeited.
Vote Placed by adontimasu 4 years ago
adontimasu
HillmanYusef111BadtotheboneTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: FF from Pro, but Con had worse conduct (due to his non-serious response) and almost had an equal FF. Both provided at least one "argument," and Con's joke was worse than Pro's unverified arguments in the first post. As such, Pro won arguments. Pro had significantly better grammar and spelling as well.