The Instigator
SamKast
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Nate629392
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

That Jurors should be able to send questions to clarify evidence so they can make a correct verdict

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Nate629392
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/18/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 306 times Debate No: 46213
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

SamKast

Pro

I belive that jurors should be able to submit questions anonymously to a judge to clarify or find out more about a certain subject of a case in turn putting out more correct verdicts and making our cort system even more refine and just

1st round - Acceptance and what you believe and a little summary of why

2nd round - Build your case! No attacking of the other opponents facts or statements.

3rd round - Rebuttal! This is the time to deconstruct the opponent. (Aka attack opponents statements and facts)
Nate629392

Con

I accept your debate.
Jurors are already allowed to ask questions to the judge in moderation. The issue with this is the procedural issues as well as justice issues. I will elaborate on that in the future rounds.
Debate Round No. 1
SamKast

Pro

SamKast forfeited this round.
Nate629392

Con

My opponent has not offered to provide any evidence supporting his argument. Therefore, there is nothing to rebut.
Debate Round No. 2
SamKast

Pro

SamKast forfeited this round.
Nate629392

Con

As before mentioned, my opponent has failed to provide evidence to support his claim, therefore there is nothing to rebut.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
SamKastNate629392Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
SamKastNate629392Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro never made an argument.