The Instigator
gleek1
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
StarStrewn
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

That the government should not fund sporting events.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/7/2011 Category: Sports
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,792 times Debate No: 15233
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

gleek1

Pro

Currentyly working on a debate, have no arguements.
StarStrewn

Con

The government should definitely fund for major sporting events. Obesity, heart cancer and a number of other diseases and illnesses are increasing in numbers rapidly. Sports will encourage people to get out there and participate in excercise and sporting events.
Debate Round No. 1
gleek1

Pro

gleek1 forfeited this round.
StarStrewn

Con

StarStrewn forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
gleek1

Pro

gleek1 forfeited this round.
StarStrewn

Con

StarStrewn forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
gleek1

Pro

gleek1 forfeited this round.
StarStrewn

Con

StarStrewn forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
gleek1

Pro

gleek1 forfeited this round.
StarStrewn

Con

StarStrewn forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
gleek1StarStrewnTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Only con posted an argument...