The Instigator
Burls
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
vi_spex
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

The 5-point logic system

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Burls
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/22/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 456 times Debate No: 76802
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (8)
Votes (1)

 

Burls

Pro

1/Con is able to disprove it.
2/Con apparently cannot disprove it.
3/Con may be able to disprove it.
4/Con cannot disprove it.
5/Con is withheld from disproving it.
vi_spex

Con

there is no need to disprove what hasnt been proved?

cause+effect=logic

define your logic system if this isnt just some trap
Debate Round No. 1
Burls

Pro

Propositional logic.
vi_spex

Con

there is no logic in fantasy, the future is imaginary, try doing it with these Words on the screen
Debate Round No. 2
Burls

Pro

The future is not imaginary, it is effect from a cause, you stated so yourself.
vi_spex

Con

you have never seen the future with your eyes
Debate Round No. 3
Burls

Pro

We see lots of futuristic things on TV; Causes that result in effect perhaps.
vi_spex

Con

your tv or the light on your tv screen is in the future?

to say 5 seconds ahead of now is true is to say reality is 5 seconds ahead of reality
Debate Round No. 4
Burls

Pro

The proof is in the pudding.
Debate Round No. 5
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
your lack of arguments is humor
Posted by Preston 2 years ago
Preston
Oh gosh... why... well i guess 1 crazy + 1 crazy = humor...
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
a stone is not, not a stone, done
Posted by Preston 2 years ago
Preston
Yea, delete this debate and be more clear, this is all the info someone has to go on for the debate:
TITLE: The 5-point logic system
First Post:
1/Con is able to disprove it.
2/Con apparently cannot disprove it.
3/Con may be able to disprove it.
4/Con cannot disprove it.
5/Con is withheld from disproving it.

Not enough for anything
Posted by Burls 2 years ago
Burls
The proposition is/isn't flawed.
Posted by Preston 2 years ago
Preston
i mean what is the debate?
Posted by Burls 2 years ago
Burls
Awakening.
Posted by Preston 2 years ago
Preston
what is the point of this?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by imabench 2 years ago
imabench
Burlsvi_spexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: As usual in Vi's debates, he fails to produce a single coherent argument for a debate that has an incomprehensible resolution to begin with.