All Big Issues
The Instigator
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

# The 5-point logic system

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0

Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Burls
 Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point Started: 6/22/2015 Category: Philosophy Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period Viewed: 559 times Debate No: 76802
Debate Rounds (5)

 Pro 1/Con is able to disprove it. 2/Con apparently cannot disprove it. 3/Con may be able to disprove it. 4/Con cannot disprove it. 5/Con is withheld from disproving it.Report this Argument Con there is no need to disprove what hasnt been proved? cause+effect=logic define your logic system if this isnt just some trapReport this Argument Pro Propositional logic.Report this Argument Con there is no logic in fantasy, the future is imaginary, try doing it with these Words on the screenReport this Argument Pro The future is not imaginary, it is effect from a cause, you stated so yourself.Report this Argument Con you have never seen the future with your eyesReport this Argument Pro We see lots of futuristic things on TV; Causes that result in effect perhaps.Report this Argument Con your tv or the light on your tv screen is in the future? to say 5 seconds ahead of now is true is to say reality is 5 seconds ahead of realityReport this Argument Pro The proof is in the pudding.Report this Argument Con yea :)Report this Argument
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by vi_spex 3 years ago
your lack of arguments is humor
Posted by Preston 3 years ago
Oh gosh... why... well i guess 1 crazy + 1 crazy = humor...
Posted by vi_spex 3 years ago
a stone is not, not a stone, done
Posted by Preston 3 years ago
Yea, delete this debate and be more clear, this is all the info someone has to go on for the debate:
TITLE: The 5-point logic system
First Post:
1/Con is able to disprove it.
2/Con apparently cannot disprove it.
3/Con may be able to disprove it.
4/Con cannot disprove it.
5/Con is withheld from disproving it.

Not enough for anything
Posted by Burls 3 years ago
The proposition is/isn't flawed.
Posted by Preston 3 years ago
i mean what is the debate?
Posted by Burls 3 years ago
Awakening.
Posted by Preston 3 years ago
what is the point of this?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.