The Instigator
Nico_Tenney
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
telisw37
Con (against)
Winning
13 Points

The Abrahamic God is not an Entity Mankind should Endorse

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
telisw37
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/11/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,095 times Debate No: 58816
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (7)
Votes (2)

 

Nico_Tenney

Pro

This debate will be over the discussion of whether or not the Abrahamic God is a good god and whether or not man should worship this entity at all.

Pro: God should not be worshipped
Con: God should be worshipped

The first round will be for acceptance
The second for primary arguments, no rebuttals
The third and fourth will be for our arguments in defense and opposition
The fifth round will be for closing statements and/or concession.

Please ask any questions about the rules in the comments before accepting.
telisw37

Con

Thanks. I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
Nico_Tenney

Pro

Nico_Tenney forfeited this round.
telisw37

Con

I would like to thank my opponent for offering this debate. However you offered no arguement at all.
I assert that the Abraham God will be endorsed, even if my opponent does not agree.

King James Bible
For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.

http://www.google.com...

https://www.google.com...

Debate Round No. 2
Nico_Tenney

Pro

Nico_Tenney forfeited this round.
telisw37

Con

My opponent offered nothing to argue.

My opponet's rule for Round #3: 'The third and fourth will be for our arguments in defense and opposition.'

The real facts are most of mankind does endorses the Abraham God anyway, Jews, Islam and Christian. I ssk my opponent who is he to judge mankind?


Debate Round No. 3
Nico_Tenney

Pro

Nico_Tenney forfeited this round.
telisw37

Con

My opponent offered nothing. I stand on my current argument.
Debate Round No. 4
Nico_Tenney

Pro

Nico_Tenney forfeited this round.
telisw37

Con

Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 5
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by doomswatter 2 years ago
doomswatter
Wow, your first debate and you get to go up against this guy. This debate's going to suck now.
Posted by Nico_Tenney 2 years ago
Nico_Tenney
I'll avoid a 'he doesn't exist' argument.
Posted by doomswatter 2 years ago
doomswatter
Is the debate about whether God is good, or whether he should be worshipped? I feel like those are two different concepts that could each have a debate of their own.
Posted by Preston 2 years ago
Preston
wait you're telling me that if a big man in the sky with the power too kill you and cause you to eternally suffer or make you happy forever was looking down on you that you would be like "Who needs you" and you would walk away?
Posted by NathanDuclos 2 years ago
NathanDuclos
Not really, even if god was real, I wouldn't worship him. . . .
Posted by Dennybug 2 years ago
Dennybug
Someone can easily argue against you, by using your resolution against you. You say god should not be worshiped, this means that you are validating gods existence but refuse to worship him. It's quite senseless
Posted by aburk903 2 years ago
aburk903
I see a semantic hole regarding entities, existence and ability to endorse non-existent things. Haven't the time or the urge to though.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Samreay 2 years ago
Samreay
Nico_Tenneytelisw37Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro FF.
Vote Placed by Phoenix61397 2 years ago
Phoenix61397
Nico_Tenneytelisw37Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: FF