The American form of economics is just indentured servitude for the middle class
Debate Rounds (3)
First round is for acceptance only
The moment we are born, we are brainwashed into thinking we are supposed to be "productive citizens' and we're supposed to "contribute to society".
The very things we need to survive, we must work for.
Food, clothing, shelter, health care, transportation, etc, all costs money that we earn from working.
So, it becomes a vicious cycle of earn and spend to survive. It's designed so we only make enough to survive on and maybe save for retirement.
When all of the money we earn is used up for survival purposes, then that is what's called indentured servitude. We are only working to survive. It's a form of slavery. We work to pay the debt of the cost of living. There is no alternative. Work or die.
The top rich people, however don't contribute to society. They don't do anything that benefits mankind.
They don't do manual labor, they don't manufacture, invent, or produce anything.
The way they make money is through investments, tax loopholes, interest on money they already have, and the profits that other people's labor generates for them.
It's a scam set up by the rich to keep the middle class in bondage.
The indenture that Pro speaks of is the cost of survival. More food must be bought because we continually expend energy to live, our clothes, bodies, and shelters break down, and our cars use fuel. Those who we pay for goods and services are under the same "indenture," and so must also work.
The indenture Pro describes is not to a rich person, but to someone in the room with us right now. In fact, he's sitting right next to you! And he'll steal your last penny, the fillings from your teeth, the children from your arms, and the life from your bones! And that man is Mr. N. Tropy! You can't escape him, no matter how rich or poor.
To prove that it IS the rich's fault we have to work to survive, Pro should answer the following question in the negative. If he cannot convince the voters the answer is really NO, I win:
If you were the last person on Earth, (no more rich people or class distinctions) would you have to do any work to survive?
"If you were the last person on Earth, (no more rich people or class distinctions) would you have to do any work to survive?"
Of course not.
Shelter would be free.
Food would be free.
Transportation would be free.
Clothes would be free.
Everything I would need to survive would be free.
...and don't try to argue that I'd have to MAKE those things, since you asked, "If you were the last person on Earth"
not the first person before everything was made.
I proved the answer is "no"...
I guess that gives me the win....somehow I don't think you'll agree.
If you agree with Pro that removing all rich people and economic systems means an end to all entropy that requires any work to survive, vote Pro.
If you've ever camped by yourself, vote Con.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.