The Instigator
Mattie
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
KuriouserNKuriouser
Pro (for)
Winning
9 Points

The Australia should not have the royal family

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
KuriouserNKuriouser
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/17/2012 Category: Society
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 849 times Debate No: 25649
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

Mattie

Con

That should not celebrate the royal family\we are a multicultural.
KuriouserNKuriouser

Pro

Thank you for starting this debate. Since my opponent proposes a change in the status quo she has the burden of proof. She makes a claim of multiculturalism, but fails to state why that is a reason not to have the royal family. Many in Australia still enjoy the tradition and are united together by the royal celebrations.
Debate Round No. 1
Mattie

Con

Mattie forfeited this round.
KuriouserNKuriouser

Pro

Extend my argument.
Debate Round No. 2
Mattie

Con

Mattie forfeited this round.
KuriouserNKuriouser

Pro

My opponent has forfeited and failed to present any argument for his resolution. He has failed entirely to meet his burden of proof. I have presented benefits to having the royal family in Australia that went uncontested. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Xerge 4 years ago
Xerge
MattieKuriouserNKuriouserTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit
Vote Placed by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
MattieKuriouserNKuriouserTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: titty sprinkles
Vote Placed by baggins 4 years ago
baggins
MattieKuriouserNKuriouserTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit