The Instigator
orioleking1
Pro (for)
Winning
10 Points
The Contender
doodoocream
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

The Baltimore Orioles have a shot at winning the world series this year

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
orioleking1
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/21/2013 Category: Sports
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 754 times Debate No: 34960
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

orioleking1

Pro

First round acceptance only
doodoocream

Con

In accepte
Debate Round No. 1
orioleking1

Pro

I will start out by saying that the baltimore orioles have a shot at winning the world series because of two things

1. Chris Davis leads the MLB in Home Runs, is 2nd in RBIs, and 5th in average.

2. The O's play in the best division in baseball, and have the third best record in the AL at 42-31.
doodoocream

Con

In accepte
Debate Round No. 2
orioleking1

Pro

It is obvious you don't know anything about baseball.

Anyway, The O's also have 4 players in the All Star game. They also have a 22-16 record on the road, have the third best scoring offense in the league, and have the 2nd best lineup in all of baseball, according to Bleacherreport.com
doodoocream

Con

In Accepte
Debate Round No. 3
orioleking1

Pro

I extend all arguments
doodoocream

Con

In accepte
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by deever 4 years ago
deever
Technically, all teams have a "shot" at winning the World Series.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by HeartOfGod 4 years ago
HeartOfGod
orioleking1doodoocreamTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had no arguments!!
Vote Placed by DoubtingDave 4 years ago
DoubtingDave
orioleking1doodoocreamTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Con wasted pro's time and didn't even attempt to rebut his arguments.