The Battlefield series is an overall better series than the CoD series
Debate Rounds (4)
Round 1: Acceptance
Round 2: Ratings/Critics opinions
Round 3: Gameplay
Round 4: Conclusions
Debaters must have 1500 Elo to prevent trolls.
Rules: No swearing, Con must argue that the CoD series is overall better than the Battlefield series, No debating in the comments (This goes for only Pro and Con, the audience can if they want.)
Good luck, and have fun.
I would like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate, I won't type much because I am unsure if he will actually argue instead of FFing like the others.
"cod is much better, then battlefield the controls are not hard in cod"
The controls are the same way, with a few differences, but you can actually change the settings to make it like CoD. (https://www.google.com...)
Let's compare Battlefield 3 and Call of Duty Ghosts, first. (I will get to the rest of the games later, because I am unsure if my opponent is going to forfeit or not.)
Battlefield 3's ratings:
IGN - 9.1/10 (https://www.google.com...)
Gamespot - 8.5/10 (https://www.google.com...)
Gamestop - 8.3/10 (https://www.google.com...)
Time for Call of Duty: Ghosts.
Call of Duty: Ghosts ratings:
IGN - 8.8/10 (https://www.google.com...)
Gamespot - 8/10 (https://www.google.com...)
Gamestop - 5.3/10 (NOT LYING: https://www.google.com...)
As you can see, Battlefield 3 has pleased the critics more than the CoD: Ghosts. NOT TO MENTION THE 5.3/10 IT GOT FROM GAMESTOP. I expect Con to rebut.
"Cod has more games then battlefield and it make your reaction better not battlefields crap halo game style so thumbs down for battlefield"
I guess since my opponent did not follow the rules, I will rebut his argument..
No, CoD does not. Look at these two links, and see who has more games. Battlefield has about 5 more.
Um, "it can make your reaction better." I don't see how this is an argument.
"battlefields crap halo game style so thumbs down for battlefield"
Halo has actually got better ratings than Call of Duty, so I guess that is in favor of Battlefield. 
My opponent has failed to rebut my past arguments, but since I am nice, ARGUMENTS EXTENDED. Please rebut them.
"The gameplay for cod is much better and you see these big. Youtubers play cod.the gameplay is smooth and I don't see nukes in battlefield i thought people said its like today's wars . so put your debates aside cod is a much better game."
Youtubers play CoD. This is not an argument... and I do not see your proof for this. Battlefield's gameplay is smooth, too. So this isn't really an argument, again. Nukes were only in CoD for Modern Warfare 2, no other games, so my opponent fails to have an argument too.. because it is for the whole series, not a individual game. It is NOTHING like today wars.. you can call in attack dogs, you can somehow get up in a helicopter in a matter of seconds... while in Battlefield you have to actually get in the helicopter instead of being teleported.
My opponent again says that CoD is a better game... but he has no proof for any of these, and he just stated mostly opinions. Stating "put your debates aside cod is a much better game" which he did not prove in his arguments.
I have actually given evidence, from critics and I ACTUALLY REBUTTED MY OPPONENT'S ARGUMENTS.
I urge a vote for Pro, in conduct (for not following rules and not rebutting arguments) and grammar, considering he barely even used grammar.
The rest is up to you, thank you.
bomb which is a nuke so not just mw2 conclusion cod is way better then battlefield that crap sucks and this is the last round so I can say what I want to say battlefield is really bad Titanfall is better then this.just some people like cod some people like battelfield just keep it that way
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.