The Instigator
Gabe1e
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
tysonrox03
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

The Battlefield series is an overall better series than the CoD series

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open with Elo Restrictions Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/24/2014 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 639 times Debate No: 65728
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)

 

Gabe1e

Pro

Round 1: Acceptance

Round 2: Ratings/Critics opinions

Round 3: Gameplay

Round 4: Conclusions

Debaters must have 1500 Elo to prevent trolls.

Rules: No swearing, Con must argue that the CoD series is overall better than the Battlefield series, No debating in the comments (This goes for only Pro and Con, the audience can if they want.)

Good luck, and have fun.
tysonrox03

Con

cod is much better, then battlefield the controls are not hard in cod
Debate Round No. 1
Gabe1e

Pro

I would like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate, I won't type much because I am unsure if he will actually argue instead of FFing like the others.

"cod is much better, then battlefield the controls are not hard in cod"

The controls are the same way, with a few differences, but you can actually change the settings to make it like CoD. (https://www.google.com...)


Let's compare Battlefield 3 and Call of Duty Ghosts, first. (I will get to the rest of the games later, because I am unsure if my opponent is going to forfeit or not.)

Battlefield 3's ratings:

IGN - 9.1/10 (https://www.google.com...)

Gamespot - 8.5/10 (https://www.google.com...)

Gamestop - 8.3/10 (https://www.google.com...)

Time for Call of Duty: Ghosts.

Call of Duty: Ghosts ratings:

IGN - 8.8/10 (https://www.google.com...)

Gamespot - 8/10 (https://www.google.com...)

Gamestop - 5.3/10 (NOT LYING: https://www.google.com...)

As you can see, Battlefield 3 has pleased the critics more than the CoD: Ghosts. NOT TO MENTION THE 5.3/10 IT GOT FROM GAMESTOP. I expect Con to rebut.

Good luck.

tysonrox03

Con

Cod has more games then battlefield and it make your reaction better not battlefields crap halo game style so thumbs down for battlefield
Debate Round No. 2
Gabe1e

Pro

"Cod has more games then battlefield and it make your reaction better not battlefields crap halo game style so thumbs down for battlefield"

I guess since my opponent did not follow the rules, I will rebut his argument..

No, CoD does not. Look at these two links, and see who has more games. Battlefield has about 5 more.

(http://en.wikipedia.org...)
(http://en.wikipedia.org...)

Um, "it can make your reaction better." I don't see how this is an argument.

"battlefields crap halo game style so thumbs down for battlefield"

Halo has actually got better ratings than Call of Duty, so I guess that is in favor of Battlefield. [1]

My opponent has failed to rebut my past arguments, but since I am nice, ARGUMENTS EXTENDED. Please rebut them.

Cites:

[1]- https://www.google.com...;
tysonrox03

Con

The gameplay for cod is much better and you see these big. Youtubers play cod.the gameplay is smooth and I don't see nukes in battlefield i thought people said its like today's wars . so put your debates aside cod is a much better game
Debate Round No. 3
Gabe1e

Pro

"The gameplay for cod is much better and you see these big. Youtubers play cod.the gameplay is smooth and I don't see nukes in battlefield i thought people said its like today's wars . so put your debates aside cod is a much better game."

Youtubers play CoD. This is not an argument... and I do not see your proof for this. Battlefield's gameplay is smooth, too. So this isn't really an argument, again. Nukes were only in CoD for Modern Warfare 2, no other games, so my opponent fails to have an argument too.. because it is for the whole series, not a individual game. It is NOTHING like today wars.. you can call in attack dogs, you can somehow get up in a helicopter in a matter of seconds... while in Battlefield you have to actually get in the helicopter instead of being teleported.

Conclusion

My opponent again says that CoD is a better game... but he has no proof for any of these, and he just stated mostly opinions. Stating "put your debates aside cod is a much better game" which he did not prove in his arguments.

I have actually given evidence, from critics and I ACTUALLY REBUTTED MY OPPONENT'S ARGUMENTS.

I urge a vote for Pro, in conduct (for not following rules and not rebutting arguments) and grammar, considering he barely even used grammar.

The rest is up to you, thank you.
tysonrox03

Con

Advance warfare has a
bomb which is a nuke so not just mw2 conclusion cod is way better then battlefield that crap sucks and this is the last round so I can say what I want to say battlefield is really bad Titanfall is better then this.just some people like cod some people like battelfield just keep it that way
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by akeck25 2 years ago
akeck25
I would like to state that you cant compare ghosts with battlefield 3. Battlefield 3 came out at the same time modern warfare 3 was coming out. Modern Warfare 3's rating are as follows:

Gamespot: 8.5/10

IGN: 9/10

you cant use game stops reviews because they are only community reviews. People will give ratings based off of bad shipping or rare problems. Instead you have to use Games Radar.

MW3's Games Radar: 4.5/5
Battlefield 3's Games Radar: 4/5

Therefore the ratings are very close but MW3 wins the ratings competition. I would post my sources but it wont let me hyperlink them.
No votes have been placed for this debate.