The Bible Is Immoral: It Is Acceptable To Beat Slaves According To Old Testament Laws.
Debate Rounds (3)
1. slave- a person who is owned by another. As in this definition you can tell that a slave is property of another man. Back then peoples tribes/races formed entire nations. slaves were imported from other countries and nations. They were not considered the same as a jew at the time. Jews aoso considered themselves special because they were gods chosen people. So a slave was in there eyes not a human but rather an animal, and this anim,al was there property. If this is true then they were more merciful then modern humans are to animals. And this reafirmed because slaves were not citizens but owned by citizens of Isreal.
2. Back just 250 years slaves were still owned by people and legally property. Was it legal to kill a slave then? yes, yes it was because they were property. Imagine the racism back 5,000 years ago. Isreal was one of the first nations to punish people for killing slaves, and for that are actually a good example and may have have brought the idea of civil rights too some people. So yes, Isreal is responisble to ending some racism in Amereica and other nations.
2) The Bible clearly condones slavery and openly advocates them being beaten as punishment for any misdeeds or disobedience. For those who feel that I'm being too tough on the Bible, please bear in mind that African-Americans suffered for 400 years because the Bible had a pro-slavery stance.
3) Using basic laws of logic, if slavery is immoral (and hopefully we can agree on that) and the Bible advocates slavery, then the Bible is clearly immoral.
2. "The bible clearly condones slavery and openly advocates them being beaten as punishment for any misdeeds or disobedience". Not true the verse levite:25;v39-40 says the Israelites were to treat there hebrew slaves like servants. They also gave them the option to be free after the seventh year of there service Duet 15 v12-18. There were many diffrent laws and restrictions in the bible about slavery. For one a slave could run away from its master and be welcomed as a citizen of Israel. The foreign slaves, yes remained slaves forever but were given the right to share festivals, passover, were given sabbath rest and could get circumcised too.
3. My opponent claims the" if slavery is immoral and the bible advocates slavery then obviously the bible is immoral". Well there was many restrictions as I have brought up, and also have stated that hebrew slaves eventually become free. But other then that there wee some reasons for slavery. If an Israelite had gotten into hard times they could offer to work for someone else in exchange for someone to look after them. If a debtor couldent pay back his money his children became slaves along with him. For foreign slaves it could have been a way to keep prisoners without killing them. This reason could apply to david putting the ammonites to forced labor [2 sam. 12.31]. People fail to realize this was some 5000-12000 years ago, were reasons for slavery were immense, and when almost every nation advocated slavery. And Israel was one of the first nations to have these restrictions for slave owning.
I send the argument back to pro!
Ugh...wrong!! Please differentiate:
1) They were bought and sold.
2) They were forced to due hard, thankless tasks for no money or compensation.
3) They were beaten if they were disobedient.
4) They were considered the property of another human being.
5) They had no legal rights.
6) They were often born into slavery and remained slaves until they died.
My opponent is treating biblical slaves as the equivalent of being modern day servants. Yet beating a voluntary servant would be considered assault & battery, and it is illegal.
No the Bible clearly states that beating slaves is O.K. Once again, I have shown that the Bible is immoral.
First off I found out that exodus 21:20-21 only pertains to foreign slaves. So to most slaves that rule did not effect them.
1. Hebrew slaves were not bought and sold. Foreign slaves however were but were still treated with respect.
2. Again Hebrew slaves were either ordered to be slave by a Court or voulenteered themselves. So the Hebrew slaves either agreed to do this for something like food or protection, and the other Hebrew slaves served to do harsh work for there crimes.
3. Hebrew slaves were not beaten but foreign slaves were. Though back then regular peoe would get beaten to when they misbehaved, maybe not as badly but they were beaten.
4. The slaves in the bible dd have rights as I have mentioned in the previous round. Yes they were considered property but again as I said before slavery was not always permanent.
5. (Sigh) did you not read my last argument? Yes slaves did have sone legal rights. Such as to celebrate festivals and to take rest on Sundays.
6. A man could not be thrown into slavery unless ordered to by a court or by voulanteering to be one. A person could have become a slave because he had no money or might have needed protection, if slavery was not an option msny of people would have starved.
Slavery was pertained in all the nations around Israel, at time Israel was the only nation not to force isrealites to join slavery (unless the Israelites has committed a crime). Israel did set the standered and its silly to think otherwise. Now you may argue that the bible still advocates slavery so the bible must be immoral. This is not the case, this was back thoundands of years ago when the need for slaves was much higher then now. The bible put many limitations on slavery and gave all slaves basic rights and the option to become free after the seventh year if labor. It's unfair to judge a nation from 9000 years ago with 21st century standards. I believe I have proven that slaver in the bible wisent all that bad and have done a much better job then my opponent in this topic. Vote con!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Nimbus328 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||5||1|
Reasons for voting decision: The bible is biased towards the Jews. Gentile slaves were mistreated. Most of the world is gentile.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.