The Instigator
Edlvsjd
Pro (for)
Winning
12 Points
The Contender
drewfox83
Con (against)
Losing
2 Points

The Boston bombing was a false flag operation perpetrated by the US government

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Edlvsjd
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/29/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,289 times Debate No: 85751
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (48)
Votes (4)

 

Edlvsjd

Pro

First round acceptance
drewfox83

Con

I accept this challenge
Debate Round No. 1
Edlvsjd

Pro

Evidence continues to accumulate across the internet from vigilant free-thinkers and conspiracy researchers proving that the Boston marathon bombing, just like the Sandy Hook and Aurora shootings, just like 9/11 and 7/7, was a false-flag operation carried out by the government. I've compiled the following key bullet points, pictures and videos which completely blow open the mainstream media version of this event:


































































































































































-The two suspect's backpacks aren't even the same color or design as the exploded backpack

-Two other men with the same color and design backpacks as the exploded backpack have been completely ignored by the "investigation" and mainstream media reports. They are wearing wires, built and dressed like military, and wearing the logo of a private security firm (like Blackwater) called Craft. Not only that, but one of them is on film running away from the explosion with his backpack missing!

-Several of the suspect's family members including their parents said they were being set-up and that the FBI had been controlling them for years

-The Boston Bomb squad was there at the marathon running bomb drills, just like 9/11, 7/7, Oslo, and other false-flags where they "coincidentally" just so happened to be doing terror drills. This "simultaneous drill" excuse has been used again and again in false-flag operations

-The wheelchair double amputee victim "Jeff Bauman" has been positively identified as being Nick Vogt, an Afghan war vet whose legs were already blown off!

-Three of the same policemen at Sandy Hook have also been positively identified at the Boston bombing

-While being interviewed the Boston police chief in a likely Freudian slip referred to the suspects as "actors"

-The predictive programming cues were there with an in-depth Family Guy reference to bombings at the Boston marathon and a "Joggers" Illuminati card

-There was even a Boston bombing facebook aid page set up two days before it happened


https://youtu.be...

https://youtu.be...

https://youtu.be...

https://youtu.be...




drewfox83

Con

drewfox83 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Edlvsjd

Pro

Another one bites the dust
drewfox83

Con

drewfox83 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
48 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Edlvsjd 1 year ago
Edlvsjd
And you lost
Posted by drewfox83 1 year ago
drewfox83
this debate was really dumb so I just quit it ,and I did not have time to answer your arguments.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
S'alright. It happens.
Posted by snkcake666 1 year ago
snkcake666
@Whiteflame
I apologize, I ended up mistaking the debate on one of those.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: FlamboGus// Mod action: NOT Removed<

1 points to Pro (Conduct). Reasons for voting decision: FF

[*Reason for non-removal*] Votes on full forfeit debates are not moderated unless they award more points to the side that forfeited. Just to be clear, though, a forfeit is sufficient reason to award conduct.
************************************************************************
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: kkjnay// Mod action: NOT Removed<

3 points to Pro, 2 points to Con. Reasons for voting decision: Pictures are not arguments, but Con didn't argue anything.

[*Reason for non-removal*] Votes on full forfeit debates are not moderated unless they award more points to the side that forfeited. As this voter awarded one more point to the side that did not forfeit, it's not moderated.
************************************************************************
Posted by Edlvsjd 1 year ago
Edlvsjd
Cast a vote bruh
Posted by Citizen_of_the_Web 1 year ago
Citizen_of_the_Web
I can't believe Edlvsjd won this argument.
Posted by Edlvsjd 1 year ago
Edlvsjd
You think Buzz and company went through it no problem?
Posted by snkcake666 1 year ago
snkcake666
Not necessarily.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
Edlvsjddrewfox83Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con only accepted the argument and then forfeited turns, he never actually argued. Pro made arguments giving him the more convincing argument points by default.
Vote Placed by FlamboGus 1 year ago
FlamboGus
Edlvsjddrewfox83Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Grandzam 1 year ago
Grandzam
Edlvsjddrewfox83Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by kkjnay 1 year ago
kkjnay
Edlvsjddrewfox83Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: Pictures are not arguments, but Con didn't argue anything.