The Instigator
SuperTrooper44
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
JimShady
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

The Bryan Mullins Logic: Christmas Is A Big Distraction For Murder, Christmas Should Be Ban

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
JimShady
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/13/2017 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 809 times Debate No: 102590
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (28)
Votes (2)

 

SuperTrooper44

Pro

Since in this rant video: https://www.youtube.com...
Bryan Mullins says he is proud that the fact that churches are slaughtering America's children has been proven and the Christmas is a big distraction for murder.

Christmas cartoon icons like Rudolph The Red Nose Reindeer, Frosty The Snowman, and Santa Claus are truly big distractions to distract your kids into believing lies and to distract children from the fact that churches are slaughtering America's children for not believing in it.
Dancing toys and women sexualizing themselves like the female dancing toys that sing "Santa Baby" is also one of their distraction techniques, singing, caroling, and kissing under the "mistletoe" are distraction techniques too.
Christmas should be banned because we should not have to be slaughtered for not believing in it.
We should have freedom of opinion for believing different but not to be killed

So, vote for pro.
JimShady

Con

People who do not believe in Christmas are not killed in any country that I know of. Now, there may be one or two instances where a HIGHLY radical Catholic or Christian killed someone for not believing in the holiday, but instances like this, if there are even ANY, will be extremely rare. Christmas should not be banned because it's good effects far outweigh it's negative effects. Families are brought together where they can settle there differences, and the community comes together and has a sense of brotherhood.

In some cases, Christmas has helped save lives. Of course poor people can get nourishment especially on this holiday, but let's not forget the Christmas Truce in 1914, during the first winter of WWI. British and German troops laid down their weapons and met in No Man's Land to exchange cigarettes and play a few gams and just hang out for a little between war.

Pro has posted a meaningless video with 2 views that has no evidence whatsoever. Vote Con because he has facts.
Debate Round No. 1
28 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by passwordstipulationssuck 1 year ago
passwordstipulationssuck
sic semper evello mortem tyrannis.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: PowerPikachu21// Mod action: NOT Removed<

3 points to Con (Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: Pro's argument relies heavily on the fact that 1) Christmas is a distraction technique, and 2) Churches are slaughtering children. I feel like all he's doing is an Appeal to Emotion/Fear. Con points out that it's highly unlikely Pro's assumptions are true, and Christmas, as far as we're concerned, helps families be happy together. In the debate itself, Pro has 0 actual arguments, so arguments to Con. Pro's source doesn't contain actual information, and just restates his opinion with added details that go unsupported. Con never used a source at all, so sources are tied.

[*Reason for non-removal*] The voter sufficiently explains the points allocated, pointing to specific arguments made by both debaters and assessing an outcome based on those arguments.
************************************************************************
Posted by JimShady 1 year ago
JimShady
Your argument has an even bigger lack of explanation.
Posted by Mharman 1 year ago
Mharman
And you admitted to multi accounting.
Posted by SuperTrooper44 1 year ago
SuperTrooper44
@PowerPikachu21 Okay this is BryanMullindNOCHRISTMAS2's 2nd account, ok?
your vote has a lack of explanation
Posted by PowerPikachu21 1 year ago
PowerPikachu21
If you're going to make a 2nd account, at least be subtle about you being the 2nd account.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: passwordstipulationssuck// Mod action: Removed<

5 points to Con (Arguments, Sources). Reasons for voting decision: Pro bases his entire argument on the premise that Christian churches are murdering children for not believing in christmas. Absurd claims such as this one would require at least some degree of evidence which pro has failed to provide. Despite the fact that con didn't provide a conventional source while pro provided something, I'm going to give it to con because he did end up citing a source for the Christmas truce in the comments section. arguments go to con because I watched the video pro provided and it's frankly ridiculous. convincing arguments goes to con because of the ludicrous allegations made by pro that have gone unsubstantiated in his case.

[*Reason for removal*] Sources are insufficiently explained. Unless the rules of the debate say differently, the voter is only allowed to award these points on the basis of sources given in the debate, not in the comments.
************************************************************************
Posted by JimShady 1 year ago
JimShady
You know you are lame when you have make an alternate account to compliment yourself.
Posted by PowerPikachu21 1 year ago
PowerPikachu21
If you don't like a vote, there's always the "report" function. Though keep in mind that if the vote sufficiently assesses their point allocations, the vote stays.
Posted by PowerPikachu21 1 year ago
PowerPikachu21
My vote wasn't removed because my opinion is wrong. I just need to not give source points, I guess. My reason for giving Argument points is sufficient, though.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
SuperTrooper44JimShadyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro entering this debate had a burden: to prove that children are factually being slaughtered, and Christmas is to distract us from it. Apparently he's serious about this too. Either way, pro needed to provide some evidence that this was actually happening in the real world according to real evidence. Con points out that pro didn't prove anything and that there's no evidence that pro could've found to begin with. He also throws in a couple positives to christmas to finish off his argument. So con wins arguments, because pro failed to uphold his burden.
Vote Placed by PowerPikachu21 1 year ago
PowerPikachu21
SuperTrooper44JimShadyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's argument relies heavily on the fact that 1) Christmas is a distraction technique, and 2) Churches are slaughtering children. I feel like all he's doing is an Appeal to Emotion/Fear. Con points out that it's highly unlikely Pro's assumptions are true, and Christmas, as far as we're concerned, helps families be happy together. In the debate itself, Pro has 0 actual arguments, so arguments to Con. Pro's source doesn't contain actual information, and just restates his opinion with added details that go unsupported. Con never used a source at all, so sources are tied.