The Instigator
SuperTrooper44
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
Jonbonbon
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

The Bryan Mullins Logic: Not All Conspiracies Are True, Not All Conspiracies Are False

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
SuperTrooper44
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/18/2017 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 8 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 711 times Debate No: 102671
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (22)
Votes (2)

 

SuperTrooper44

Pro

Not all conspiracies are true and not all conspiracies are false.
Here, let me show you examples, SJM.

Some Conspiracies Are True:
For Example, Americans had a conspiracy that Nixon was going to break into Watergate, That apparently was true, Nixon had to face impeachment trials and hearings in 1974; Later, Nixon resigns and admits that he made a plan to break into Watergate.

Some Conspiracies Are False:
For Example, During The War on Terror, Some Americans had the conspiracy that George W. Bush had WMDs in iraq to kill innocent civilians, But that conspiracy is false, Later, Saddam Hussein was pushed out of power and on May 2011, Osama Bin Laden was killed, marking the end of The War in Iraq and Afghanistan.

So, there are my examples, I conclude that:
(1) Some Conspiracies Are True
(2) Some Conspiracies Are False
Jonbonbon

Con

I'm here to take this debate because most people may not know how to handle this. This debate is a truism. I could probably debate the definition of conspiracy, but what would be the point? Don't award anyone any points.

Pro shouldn't get the win for starting a topic that he couldn't lose. Like if I started the topic "2+2=4." Obviously, there are some times that a conspiracy can be found true. And obviously there are some that are false.

Either way, this debate has no point, so I urge you to keep scrolling through the debate tab as if this never existed. You've already wasted so much of your life by reading this. I've wasted even more by editing my spelling mistakes. Run while you still can. Or report this to airmax. I don't care. Just don't vote on it. Have a good day.
Debate Round No. 1
22 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by canis 7 months ago
canis
And you did not..That is why you never had a chance to to winn a very very easy one..
Posted by canis 7 months ago
canis
If you do not understand the absolute basics of "philo"..Just ask ..
Posted by Jonbonbon 7 months ago
Jonbonbon
I honestly have never understood what you were talking about. I was hoping that if I ignored you then you'd stop commenting, but you're blowing up notifications over a bunch of rambling.
Posted by canis 7 months ago
canis
Hmm. It is about philosophy....
Posted by Jonbonbon 7 months ago
Jonbonbon
Canis I'm going to have to ask you to discontinue your behavior immediately.
Posted by canis 7 months ago
canis
Another.. "philo" with nothing...
Posted by canis 7 months ago
canis
So it is not possible to post a conspiraci that was/is not false..
Posted by canis 7 months ago
canis
Hi.. All conspiracies are false. Facts are never false....
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 7 months ago
BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2
After 2 votes,
The Winner is.........

SuperTrooper44
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 7 months ago
BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2
Apparently it is literal when I say that church pastors, goers, and priests threaten women and children for refusing to join their cult:
Check it out:
https://youtu.be...
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 8 months ago
dsjpk5
SuperTrooper44JonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Just checking if I could vote on a debate where the time has expired. Tie.
Vote Placed by TheMarketLibertarian 8 months ago
TheMarketLibertarian
SuperTrooper44JonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made no counter argument, Pro provided example.