The Instigator
Stephen_Hawkins
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
Calvincambridge
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

The Christian deity is immoral.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Stephen_Hawkins
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/17/2011 Category: Religion
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 890 times Debate No: 17946
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (8)
Votes (2)

 

Stephen_Hawkins

Pro

The position is clear, and I shall not define every word because it means one of two things if you require me to, either a) you want a semantics debate or b) your English is appalling, but I shall define morality slightly:

In God being immoral, the answer to the euthrypro's dilemma is that God is good, rather than good is God. God's actions aren't good because he does them; they are good because they are moral.

The Christian deity, yahweh, or God, refers directly to Him.
Calvincambridge

Con

I gladly accept your debate
Debate Round No. 1
Stephen_Hawkins

Pro

Stephen_Hawkins forfeited this round.
Calvincambridge

Con

Calvincambridge forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Stephen_Hawkins

Pro

Stephen_Hawkins forfeited this round.
Calvincambridge

Con

Calvincambridge forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Stephen_Hawkins

Pro

Stephen_Hawkins forfeited this round.
Calvincambridge

Con

Calvincambridge forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by BennyW 5 years ago
BennyW
This was the most epic debate ever.
Posted by Calvincambridge 5 years ago
Calvincambridge
oh okay
Posted by Stephen_Hawkins 5 years ago
Stephen_Hawkins
Well, I have been away and missed my slot, so I am not that bothered. And yes, you are new, but from the other debates you've done, you really should judge others debates before jumping in yourself (as you do in face-to-face type events, most newbies judge and only debate sparingly).
Posted by Calvincambridge 5 years ago
Calvincambridge
i'm not a troll if you accuse me you must be one yourself i'm new thats all.
Posted by Steve0Yea 5 years ago
Steve0Yea
dont even bother stephen hes trolled the last 4 of his debates you could type nonsense and still beat him.
Posted by Calvincambridge 5 years ago
Calvincambridge
OK cool your from Britain.
Posted by Stephen_Hawkins 5 years ago
Stephen_Hawkins
I am sorry, but I will have to put this off for the first round, going to other side of england for work contract. Can we have this debate in a few days?
Posted by BennyW 5 years ago
BennyW
I am considering this once I determine if I will be able to dedicate the time to it.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by CD-Host 5 years ago
CD-Host
Stephen_HawkinsCalvincambridgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side debated but R1 Pro was the better of the two. Conduct for not presenting a case. Neither side had sources.
Vote Placed by kohai 5 years ago
kohai
Stephen_HawkinsCalvincambridgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: I just gave the s/g to pro for horrible s/g from con. Con forgot his period