The Instigator
exorb
Pro (for)
Losing
9 Points
The Contender
Korashk
Con (against)
Winning
80 Points

The Creator of all things made a big bang, and thus created evolution.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-6
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/12/2010 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,098 times Debate No: 10802
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (12)
Votes (14)

 

exorb

Pro

This is the truth.
Korashk

Con

Thanks for making this debate exorb.

Definitions:
Evolution - a 2001 sci-fi/comedy film [1]
The Creator of All Things - a Creator, God [2]

Evolution was not created by "The Creator of All Things," it was created by a myriad of individuals including, but not limited to:
*Don Jakoby
*David Diamond
*Davis Weissman
*Jeff Apple

None of these individuals, or any others involved in the creation of Evolution, are "The Creator of All Things" therefore the resolution is negated.

[1] http://www.imdb.com...
[2] http://dictionary.reference.com...
Debate Round No. 1
exorb

Pro

Wow. Everything is clear now! Thanks for your deep incite.

Your post is a clear case of meaning distortion.
You are wresting away from the intended true meaning.
I find it hard to believe that you think that I was talking about the movie.
I will assume that you know what I was talking about.
If so than the communication process was complete.

This ‘game' that goes on with this site of trying to take things out of context ruins everything. I'm done with this site. This is stupid.
Korashk

Con

My opponent has failed to fulfil his burden of proof or refute my claims. I rest my side of the debate and strongly urge a Con vote.
Debate Round No. 2
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Alex 7 years ago
Alex
I'm surprised anybody voted on the debate at all.
Posted by Vaibanez 7 years ago
Vaibanez
Your arrogant first "argument" was essentially, completely, utterly, fruitfully, halariously, fantastically, entirely, hastily, well I'll just get to the point......PWNED!!!!!
Posted by nickthengineer 7 years ago
nickthengineer
Exorb I would have voted for you if you didn't waste your first round and then not try to get the debate back on track in R2 by saying what you planned to say anyway. I hate semantics but con at least said something.
Posted by Maikuru 7 years ago
Maikuru
I'm not a fan of them but semantic arguments trump no arguments every time.
Posted by Kleptin 7 years ago
Kleptin
This type of "game" isn't played very often. You were just punished for not providing an introductory argument. Don't blame the site for the just desserts to your laziness. You should put thought into every round.

A debate is a duel. What you did is the same as going up to your challenger and saying "Hit me with your best shot!". It's not his fault that his "best shot" is a kick in the balls.

Establish the rules first. That's what you're supposed to do.
Posted by mongoose 7 years ago
mongoose
Even after I gave him an argument.

FAIL.
Posted by Ore_Ele 7 years ago
Ore_Ele
Nice.
Posted by Korashk 7 years ago
Korashk
I would have tkaen this debate seriously if you did.
Posted by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
Nooooo! exorb, come back! Semantics are fun! Just define your words next time, and you'll be okay! Learn from your mistakes!
Posted by Kinesis 7 years ago
Kinesis
Should have said 'no semantics allowed' if you didn't want semantics. Besides, what's the point of a two round debate in which you forfeit one round? Nothing of interest would have been said anyway.
14 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by GeorgeCarlinWorshipper 6 years ago
GeorgeCarlinWorshipper
exorbKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Marader 7 years ago
Marader
exorbKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by Koopin 7 years ago
Koopin
exorbKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by Talon 7 years ago
Talon
exorbKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Vote Placed by Vaibanez 7 years ago
Vaibanez
exorbKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by kingofslash5 7 years ago
kingofslash5
exorbKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:16 
Vote Placed by Cherymenthol 7 years ago
Cherymenthol
exorbKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by XimenBao 7 years ago
XimenBao
exorbKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by ricky78 7 years ago
ricky78
exorbKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Sky_ace25 7 years ago
Sky_ace25
exorbKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07