The Instigator
Pro (for)
3 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

The Electoral College is a more fitting system for the United States of America than popular vote

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/14/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,245 times Debate No: 45991
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (1)




The debate shall function as follows. My opponent will be arguing for popular vote over the electoral college for the United States of America. I shall be arguing for the electoral college to stay in place. There will be no polls used for this debate. Public opinion-based statistics are invalid in this debate.

My argument:
Round 1: State the rules
Round 2: Affirmative Constructive
Round 3: Affirmative Rebuttal
Opponent's argument:
Round 1: State position and acceptance of debate (for instance, "I am for the popular vote and accept this debate)
Round 2: Negative Constructive
Round 3: Negative Rebuttal


I accept your challenge. I oppose the Electoral College and I believe the popular vote is the better system for vote counting.
Debate Round No. 1


The electoral college is a more fitting system for the United States of America than popular vote.

Many voting machines, in the United States, are rigged [1][4][5]. In order to prevent such fraud from scaling to a national level, we must first stop rigged votes in the states.

Dead people can be placed into the election process not by others, and the vote still remains valid [6]. We can prevent this fraud from reaching a national level with the electoral college.

Popular vote, as being a direct democracy, is unconstitutional! These persons are trying to form something of a democracy from us, the matter of which is unsanctioned by our forefathers. How dare those vouching against this system consider such an injustice, as the constitution has not had such an unreasonable change, as to change what we are governing ourselves with.

The electoral college amplifies the votes and opinions of minorities as majorities in some states although minorities when placed on a national scale, contrast hispanics percent in New Mexico and in the United States as a whole[1][2]. Over 45% of the state of New Mexico is hispanic[2]. The hispanic opinions are amplified by the entire state's votes being in a great deal, what they believe is best for themselves as a region of the United States of America.

"A popular election in this case is radically vicious. The ignorance of the people would put it in the power of some one set of men dispersed through the Union, and acting in concert, to delude them into any appointment." said Delegate Gerry, July 25, 1787. We can stop the whims of many voters on a state level before that of national.

This is the will of the state in general, and nothing less. Every single vote counting, from the nation as a whole, is not what our country stands for. The majority of a state does represent the will of the state. Voting to find what the majority of the state believes, is the best way to find what is best for the state. It counts out a great many of the votes cast by those who know little to nothing about politics, nor do those persons care to any extent in many situations. States are, in many cases, with different markets and political ideals from one another, and for each person to speak up... you might as well be a Union supporter in Georgia during the civil war. Your opinion is not for the good of the state, but what the good of the state is, shalt be what a majority of its population agrees upon, exemplified by chosen representatives who meet with other persons who represent the different views of their states!

[1] (the video of a 2012 voting machine)
[4] (the video of Ron Paul testimony)


WilliamsP forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2


I would like to point out that my opponent made no opening statement, by forfeiting round 2, and conclude by this that I have won the debate.


First of all, I would like to apologize for me having forfeited the round. I happen to have a lot of work to do and therefore cannot be online regularly.

Now, to make my argument:

The popular vote is not only simpler, but it is also more democratic. The popular vote is much simpler due to the votes having to simply be added together. The rigged votes can be prevented with more regulations and controls. I recognize the flaws of the popular vote and I see the advantages of the Electoral College, but I also hope you acknowledge the fact that the popular vote is indeed on the side of true justice.
In 2000, Gore and Bush had a dispute over the votes. Bush won the electoral votes and Gore won the popular vote. If a larger portion of people wish to have one candidate but get the other instead, that is injustice. If we eradicated the Electoral College, there wouldn't be as many vote disputes and there would most certainly not be issues of democracy. I understand that the United States is in fact a republic, not a democracy. But by "democracy", I am addressing the issue of voting.
Now, if a majority of people in a state support a candidate and that state's electoral votes go to that candidate, what shall become of the people who supported the other candidate? Their voices are unheard and their opinions are not acknowledged. That, my friend, is injustice.

I would like to point out that I did not cite my sources. But the truth is, my friend, citing sources doesn't automatically make you win a debate. Instead of using websites, you can use logical reasoning.

Now, the debate shall be decided by the voters. To the voters, I say this: Please read the debate entirely before voting. There are some important points in here.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by WilliamsP 3 years ago
I am not a great debater. I admit.that.
Posted by Logical_Reason 3 years ago
Colelevine, I did not include that as the most popular two sides are the popular vote and the electoral college. If the question was up in such a way that any other opinion would be valid, he who should be making a case against the electoral college could pose one in such a way that modifications are being proposed.
Posted by Logical_Reason 3 years ago
Williams, you weren't supposed to put an opening statement in that section, that was for rebuttals; you might as well have forfeited the third round.
Posted by colelevine 3 years ago
Not considering America is an egalitarianism in which power is to be yielded to the citizens.
Posted by bubbatheclown 3 years ago
To all DDO Users:
I have created a 2020 Mock Presidential Election, located in the forum. If you wish to participate as a candidate, sign up. If you do not wish to participate, feel free to watch and vote anyway.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by donald.keller 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: FF. Convincing Argument: Without rebuttals being an option, I can't vote this to anyone. Sources: Pro had many of them.