The Instigator
Pboy21
Pro (for)
Losing
10 Points
The Contender
mee2kool4u369
Con (against)
Winning
19 Points

The Error of Evolution of Creation

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
mee2kool4u369
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/22/2012 Category: Religion
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 824 times Debate No: 22239
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (6)

 

Pboy21

Pro

Thursday, March 22, 2012
The Error of Evolution
Many people and Theologians are believing in a evolution theory, by this process removing any creation Facts but adapting to more a scientific mindset where the creation of man and the universe has spurned into a moment where spontaneously this dot of matter erupted expanding the existence of the universe where time and space began. While some refer to the Big Bang Theory as accurate Evidence of the existence and evidence of the universe.. Not only can evolution be False,but as science always changes. The theories for man`s origin as evolved species of primates or from an amphibious creature evolving through a series of Evolution states.
Not only is this wrong but inaccurate to the forming of the Universe and Mankind existence as there is a substantial evidence for the Creation account of mankind from God a ultimate being creating the Existence of all things Atheists will disprove such a account to even prove an erroneous account of man from primates..
please fill free to blog and give opinions for this reason i am writing for a school assignment where ill need to show what evolutionist and Atheists believe names will not be given .. thank you
mee2kool4u369

Con

It is absolutely possible that your case of evidence happened. I am going to go with the scientists who are masters at this stuff. You think the there is no possible way, but scientist do have some sort of proof.
Debate Round No. 1
Pboy21

Pro

i am not saying evidence for science is wrong i am saying that evolution is wrong on the theory that it holds to the existence of the universe for God created the universe there had to be a creator
mee2kool4u369

Con

I agree it sounds odd... I agree with you.
Debate Round No. 2
Pboy21

Pro

so continuing on
God is the creator
we look at our Dna and see it is complex now many people say its evolution process but never give a real reason why this pattern is seen
but to look closely on the design we have to see the reflection of the creator behind his work
as we read in Genesis 1:1 it says God created this is thus the breathing out of
now we see that a infinite God just created to what is seen today .. the universe earth est.
Now man was created in his image not from monkeys because if you look there is no similarity to that yeah scientist say so but who is man .
now many will say that you can trust in science becuz it changes and that is their strength but i say that is false and that is their weaknesses when you believe in to somthing you believe because it doesn't change but stays the same as a given fact that when u go to the bible and God creating you trust in him because he made mankind and you and the says he never changes
mee2kool4u369

Con

CASE CLOSED
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by Man-is-good 5 years ago
Man-is-good
Well....this debate was better than nothing....
Posted by GenesisCreation 5 years ago
GenesisCreation
I don't believe this debate was a duplicate account. Con used case sensitive syntax. Pro did not.

(i said vs. I said) consistently unique syntax and grammar.
Posted by Oldfrith 5 years ago
Oldfrith
Actually Con, Scientists have a THEORY, not a fact, of evolution. Not a scrap of it is proven, which is why Atheists is under the religion tab.
Posted by Pboy21 5 years ago
Pboy21
um it would be for creation account given by the bible this is for and assignment for christian apologetics
Posted by DouggyFresh 5 years ago
DouggyFresh
It would appear you support the error of evolution of creation.
Posted by WriterDave 5 years ago
WriterDave
I'm confused. What, exactly, is the resolution you wish to argue?
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by Mimshot 5 years ago
Mimshot
Pboy21mee2kool4u369Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Bah, I think I'm dumber for having read this. Both parties seem to not understand what a debate is. I would give negative points to both of them if I could, but since I can't I'm giving con the grammar point since he a least wrote in complete sentences.
Vote Placed by WriterDave 5 years ago
WriterDave
Pboy21mee2kool4u369Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro didn't make any arguments in round 2, only assertions. He attempted to make arguments in final round, which is improper. Against that kind of strategy, Con's response, which amounted to no response at all, was nonetheless entirely appropriate.
Vote Placed by GenesisCreation 5 years ago
GenesisCreation
Pboy21mee2kool4u369Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: I'm not sure why Con is winning. He agreed with Pro and forfeited his last round. Defeat by admission and forfeiture. This is not a duplicate account. Pay attention to grammar and syntax before calling people names and dropping hate votes. Be impartial or stop voting.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
Pboy21mee2kool4u369Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: what imabench said
Vote Placed by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
Pboy21mee2kool4u369Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: MULTIACCOUNTING!!!! All points to the con for pro being a d*ck
Vote Placed by vmpire321 5 years ago
vmpire321
Pboy21mee2kool4u369Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gave up. wtf was this.