Hello, we debated previously and you mentioned you were a Christian. I'd like to debate you on this issue. You go first as you have the burden of proof.
My proof is more questions than answers. How does a zygote have the same genetic code as an old person? How do life forms exist in all of their complexity without God? How does gravity exist? How do all of the planets revolve around the sun while turning in place. What or who made the big bang happen? How does an organism evolve into another species? Why do identical twins have differing personalities? Science is awesome, but so is God.
"God is a person, and creation is a mirror that reflects Him. Is not your mirror evidence of you when you look?" - Only if I knew that the mirror was reliable. I do not know that creation is a reliable mirror.
My closing points. You should go to: https://www.gotquestions.org... for further information. You can submit a question, and they will get back to you within 1 or 2 weeks.
Just because things exist does not mean "god" or "gods" exist. In fact "god" or "gods" existence only confuses the matter of creation. What created "god" or "gods"
A burden of proof is shared equally as GOD is an axiom, and must also be established as its group of numbers by representation, then proven as group of numbers how they not explain a process of existence. The argument of debate is Constitutional over religious tyranny as many religions do not have a God yet are religion just the same.
May I suggest a more complicated question to answer?
What is the self-value of GOD?
Just because things exist, doesn't mean God exists. There's proof of things existing, but none of God himself. You say that God is a person. How do you get proof of that from the fact that things exist? God could be two people. He could be a woman. He could have created everything and then died. You have no proof of otherwise.
God might have created everything; but that would not be proof of Jesus or Christianity. In fact, others might consider it proof of Islam or Hinduism. How did you come to the conclusion that Christianity was correct?
Why do you assume God created the universe? The universe may come from God, but you have no proof of that. The universe may come from nothing; again, we can't prove that. But both are possibilities. So, what makes God's existence any more possible than any other possibility?
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.
May I suggest a more complicated question to answer?
What is the self-value of GOD?
God might have created everything; but that would not be proof of Jesus or Christianity. In fact, others might consider it proof of Islam or Hinduism. How did you come to the conclusion that Christianity was correct?
Why do you assume God created the universe? The universe may come from God, but you have no proof of that. The universe may come from nothing; again, we can't prove that. But both are possibilities. So, what makes God's existence any more possible than any other possibility?